NEW-TRG Postponed Today (October 11, 2023!)

 Due to limited space at the Oneida Community Education Center on Packerland Drive...

We will pick up the meeting time and space next week! October 18, 2023 from 2pm to 4pm!

Just a quick reminder on the statistics of Native American youth in America currently with their education endeavors: 

"On average, less than 50 percent of Native students graduate from high school each year in the seven states with the highest-percentage of American Indian and Alaska Native students." (Article below from NCAI.org)

This means that the tribal school are putting out half-success rates for those that can graduate. If it's not being surrounded by your own to learn, culturally invigorate, and remain community instilled - what is this saying about the luxuries that you don't understand are at risk here? 

That is federal, community, state funds and grants being wasted on a lack of achievement. If these rates don't go up, there won't be a tribal school and you'll be reading more news articles without the Native American population entirely, especially at the rate that cultural loss and change of lifestyle is heading towards - an average American citizen with the same expectations of success in this societal ladder we climb. If you think it's difficult now, with all of the equal opportunity, government assistance, and socio economical support streaming through tribal services to be healed and ready to be a parent, a student, a working member of the nation --- it's time to give back to your community, your country, and the people that do not have that assistance by providing your services for a commonwealth. This is the historical concept of community, commonwealth, and at any successful rate it requires many attributes in societal order to want to remain in place. During modern times, this is not guaranteed to have your elite remain if the community provides no efforts to keep their elite. 

Every Native American parent, whose child attends a tribal school, should know where that money comes from, what other parents in other schools who cannot afford their child's education are doing. There are people in America who do not belong to a funded grant or federal Pell grant that have to work for their education, save for their education, and be in a financial deficit by their education. Do you realize what you believe is suffering today is typically a lack of appreciation and volition to put forth the effort to want better and do better today? 

Please, get involved. Understand the future concepts of leadership and how to be what you want in your leadership to recruit you in their agenda for a better future. 

Below is a snapshot of the NCAI.ORG website on Policy Issues and Education, Health & Human Services while researching "Native American IT" in a google search query. 

Where are Native Americans in the future? Statistically, we are failing and behind most others in reading and mathematics. History will look back and state, the funds were there, the access was available, and the services were astounding for continual support and guidance. What was the real issue here? Snap out of it and get involved! Take an acting class, understand how your emotions follow your actions and CAN improve. Stoicism should be a disease for traumatic repatriation techniques. Remain vital and continue pushing positive reinforcements of your identity by excellent performance scores in school. 

Support Your Local Tribal School by Donating Books, Time, Guidance, and find ways to get excited about learning and wanting to teach the proper way!

Episodes of Null Streaking Through The Memory Slots

 Binary Compositions Create A Venue

When zero is defined using basic arithmetic and the inevitable natural zero defines a self-taught machine that zero can be anybody it wants to... Just as long as you never look at your true 'one' and believe them. 

The realistic measures of a zero and being surrounded by a vast identity crises of 'ones' in every graphical slot is the immeasurable theory that zero cannot consume its space. If space were to prevail in the composition of 'one' abilities, the value of it goes missing and is left to space instead. Zero, being zero, does not move. The creep is lurking around trying to figure out how to attack this zero, from the inside...

In the month of October, we have just got done witnessing four Supermoons in a row, within three months, and gearing up for a Solar Eclipse. How is this not an immemorial time to recollect what we did during these months leading up into the awesome natural phenomenon that we dare not become entangled with the calm space that surrounds us to escape 'the creep' trying to get in the moment you reveal your zero ability. <cough> I mean, if that's your thing, in nerd stuff with big words and even bigger ambitions of future career goals like being the first to dominate in a programming language or straddle the moon with a counting diplomacy. What are we excited for right now, as Americans? Watching the Indians in an untouched hemisphere of the moon THE ENTIRE TIME THIS IS GOING ON on OUR SIDE OF THE PLANET! Literally. Think about this. This may or may not have been planned, but that is the most awesome job to be thinking of while living daily life. <cough> Still excited about that Jupiter trip though.

So, before you go and let it all out, just recollect the big boom theory. As soon as that zero believed it was safe to let go, that 'one' was released into a mayhem that is theoretically unknown. So, with that being said, I introduce to you my theory on the Big Bang. 

When a zero is catatonic to circumference as axial is to memory with space and location, the null streak (new terminology here, not typical to use "null" but since it is known in programming, I'm going to lift it up beyond the cusp of the constructor we sometimes leave empty handed as it finally descends and crashes a system.                 ......................................................................................................................

                                    The 'one' stability of maintaining zero, rips. This reality is strongheld by zeroes inability to grasp what is dormant in 'one' and 'space' for being incapable of axial location and being thinly placed to believe its depth is known or sought for. They technically do not exist without zero. Zero, may or may not know this, but its the premise of its nature to baffle 'one' and 'space' in the same sense. Why does it not go chasing? Why does it not leave its central position? Why does 'one' ability have absence with 'zero' so that it is a natural balance in dominance and domain? 

When history revealed their zero to the world and its measurements within commerce, counting, and weight to measure in tangible efforts to prove its place within cultural beliefs and solutions with - the deprived theory of extermination was not known until pollution. It wasn't accepted until humans understood they were capable of destroying an entire species. Upon this finding, the 'one' factor arose to claim these natural sense of curious engagers who claim contact and dominance for multiple effects in destruction. The fragile wilt. The ecosystem is changed. 

The observation of a natural appearance in this study is finding an embracing heir to follow into location and dominance. Zero reigns in place for without internal digestive rations to supercede with 'one' and manipulating its claim to destroy and internally weaken this ecosystem, we would be called what? Null, is a strong word here. If Null claimed to be zero, it would be streaking through the space and stars like a log lost in the woods on nothing but downhill momentum. We see this in gravity observations, the small push to accelerate it, and the dangers of it afterwards. Null, is something like this, not Zero. 

Null does not occupy due to the time of its evidence. I am preparing for the SQL transition here as I explain what Null is (to me). It is incapable of housing, they don't say why, is 10/10 times related to zero without explanation - - - - - but I need to resolve this term. Null is not occupied due to its inability to become an ecosystem. Where fragile is capable of moving one keystone species into the next era of keystone species and each respective ecosystem that supplies what will be provided for (we see this in so many proof of earth history species and its flora/fauna effects). This does not explain what happens to the time that escapes regeneration and adaptation. The age is just evident, happens almost like a sliver of time, and immediately robust in natural explosions that supply a radically different species/era of sustenance. So, Null, being its expansively speedy self in determining its ability with 'one' and 'space' are able to catch these moments in earth time to reveal nothing saved to remember them by. 

The idea of null was the concept of nothing and the ability to reveal nothing as an answer, of any scholar conclusion could be equipped with during the explanations that persist with change. I think we feel attuned to rest with nothing or null and satisfied with the peace to feel balanced in neutrality. This is not neutral, but we cannot see evidence yet, of how this can be explained in useful terms (yet). 

These are seen on rock formations, the age of trees, the separations of layers, whether they be growing marks or surface erosions of change - are within strands of change. Evident to believe its just one layer after the other. You know that is too dramatic of a change to accept. Right? So what happens here? Well, a long time ago, there were stories of what this universe was, and in those stories, the people, the animals, the characters had a life that is invisible to what we consider realistic in reality observations. That means, the people existed before this world was done creating itself (naturally) and with that amount of time that was used to survey its entirety, became the collection of the world we see and live today. 

Now, at this point, you have to ask yourself - where in my human historical concepts does this fit and where in my modern perspective is this going to fit? That thing, right there, is what we will never classify as a time to explain repair, adaptation, or regenerative balance. Those are very important to consider in any reality and subconscious state when dealing with death theories, natural phenomenon occurences (like right now), and universal concepts that infinity dwells the expanse in every balancing direction. 

This is a zero concept, the collection of an ecosystem for known characters in a place all its own. Peiced together, by strands of thin cracks, by strands of thin hairlines, by strands of particle based layering in filtration systems to confuse the 'one' into momentum controlled defeat (raining). So, when you look at us, miniscule to universe, we are nothing but globs of time stuck together, bound into purpose of something living. 

Alright. If you can believe that... 

Zero vs. Null - It depends on what the goal is. Are you in? Then, it could be null (Yes, I know they say its not possible). Zero (Yes, I know they say its not possible) it might be. What I can believe is, the place everyone has made for it. Do you know where it is, do you know what it does to you, do you know what to do if it were that creep... Trying to get in? Its October, after all, and we all know how you get when the moon is full and its friday, <look both ways fast> the thirteenth? [I just freaked myself out for there actually being a Friday the 13th this year]. 

So, what do you want to be filled with before you go boom? Something that 'one' can claim - which is empty time, the space that filled those memory slots with 'when I get there' attitude... it'll happen. Eventually. 

Then, the big bang theory happened. But, it was this concept and material, as to how we have our ecosystem and the zero is unnanounced to the cusp that we are contained for the 'one' getting in. All that space is, empty time and speed that is determined by the object size and attraction to pull it - change its course - should be thought of again. Think about this, we just accepted space is space but we forget that it must have a story to reckon our existence in intellectualism with something that any reality can fracture and peice back together. 

At the end of this story, it breaks - put it back together? One time? Universe? Is that what it means? When does recording happen? Then what? Does it break again? So, we work with natural breaking, fragments, and accept the zero concepts of null and memory. 

This is perfect for those that are programming, how they are doing what makes sense, naturally. Did they know this directly or by chance? Does it have a name. 

___Mischief

How Do You Convert a C# 2-D Array DataType Anyways?

string[] arrayName = new string[SIZE];

This 2-D Array was filled with two different dataTypes.

This file had a name at the top and double dataTypes within the file. 

Resolve with using the StreamReader to open the file contents and put into a string array to scan this 2-D Array and find its normal readings (counted), all the higher readings (counted) and all the lower readings (counted). And basically let the program compare the file to your hard coded 2D Array. 

Sounds easy. 

Methods for this? 

There is no 2-D dataType conversion available, currently with Microsoft.Learns, the C# Programming textbook, or the Stack OverFlow Forums. So. What do you do? 

I am hoping someday to reflect back onto this blog posting so I can update with a valid solution. I want to know the intensity of this assignment and what skill level was needed to require the proper application results and be able to have a solution with this program in operable condition. 

Converting DataTypes

The parse methods are basically used. What other way is there to convert data types? I had seen in a Microsoft.Learns demo how to assign from an array's elemental location this, seemed to work, but running in the IDE it did not produce results. 

string to int; int to double; double to decimal; 

You know you have seen the measuring cup change and using the bits to bytes to mB to (capital) MB differences for converting memory to reserve for the program. The less, the better. 

So, why can't we have a method that is run (like a ToString(); or an embedded method) to automatically clip these conversions? 

DataType enforcement does take up time in the programming sections that often rely on multiple methods, lines of extra code to convert and back again if necessary. 

So, in my world of dataType conversions - is this an obsolete skill? Why can't I just have this knowledge readily available if it is supposed to be one of the easiest questions any developer could be asked. How do you change this dataType to the next? 

Well, to make it difficult, let's ask what about 2-D Arrays? Multi-dimensional Arrays in general, for multi-column files with different data.length to compensate. 

Is that all programming is? Conversion? 

Example:

Trim.Select(Program Name);

And that would take care of:

Overused dataType structures that are separating the int, double, decimal, string, static, bool, etc. into what we understand how to classify them and identify them as well from memory storage conflictions. 

What other hassles have you had with dataType conversions? How much time? Assignment grades? 

If we are going to learn this programming language, why not create the learning environment, off-season, prep time material to bypass this wasted amount of time! I want to be prepared for this course and be able to still live! I waste too much time learning a programming code without valid results. It's choppy material, puzzle peices to programs that don't apply most times to the actual assignment, or able to identify the assignment concepts with what is provided to you. 

THIS SHOULD BE EASIER. 

If its a tech school. WRAP these assignments with the necessary tools, concepts, and the only thing needed for the assignment. Don't give us the whole book and expect us to not waste our time. Plus, it leads to more questions and wanting to reference (well, what about this time when this worked). 

Let us build a notebook online for notes from students about questions they had on the material for feedback and improvement. The skill building concepts with syntax, position, why, where, how, and using what tools worked. How to manipulate those tools. How to strategize with those tools. Then we will see finer results with student success with programming. We really need a teaching style to modify the business concepts that are being used (check out the review on the "What Developers Need To Know Now" article) by providing our feedback and upgrading our teaching style to keep developing the skills needed. 

I hate the time to finish the semester - it doesn't do anything for today's learning environment. The grading rubric is great for project checklists and expectations. The time is not for everyone, however, and that should remain open-ended until the student develops it. Why are we stuck in the same position, with a group, for? Is this schedule so difficult that we cannot determine when we are available to finish this work as adults? What is expected is documented. We know it can affect our graduation time and other classes but we should not be punished for not keeping pace. The idea is to learn. 

When are we going to create a learning environment? 

We do realize we have different generational techs in the classroom and their influential environment does range! 

There are solutions. 

__Mischief

2023 Is Only Almost Over... Update On NABM!

 NABM (Native American Binary Mathematics)

This is the ground-up attempt of relational environment realities influencing interpretive binary configurations for a truly virtual experience that can separate the robotic/artificial intelligence and humanity/natural reality. This is a learned inclusion of creating a language that is not over-powered by one side or the other (machine and user/programmer) and involves passages of binary signatures with their own domain to cause its programming etiquette to relay within these mapping systems how the machine will understand its reality is binary. 

This can be multi-dimensional signatures that create an ability of how that domain is connected - without maintaining one-dimensional (x,y) grids to compare with arcs and fish-lensing where distance cannot explain its current existence in time known. The time we have in virtual spaces is not defined properly, at this time. This is cause for concern when we consider AI able to self-teach amongst the human hours of database designs and creating something that can do what a human programmer can do - which is create a tool within cyber library data banks, heirloom it, and build without clearance - as undetected communication systems go unchallenged due to the tool-making in open source code. [Which is still being learned and not fast enough by my standards.]

If I could critique, it would be too soon, the connection with NABM and current programming models creates the sense of complete upon another techno-tool in a onesie. I can't take these things apart anymore, I cannot break it and expect myself to fix it, I cannot replace with what I have in my own keeping. Not even duct tape? How are basic machine operations and purchase histories not mandatory consumer knowledge on repairing by now? How is this not important to America as consumers? I think we want to become dependent on our purchasing powers rather than our solving dilemma. We would be a different country and thinking of our technological components differently as well. 

NABM as the internal parts of explaining directional shapes in space with conditions as spatial combatants to present our experience with a new time, new tools, and new results of recognizing new domains. These signatures will be how we explain the expansion of zero, one, and the artifiicial mind who clings to its existence. If human reveals these interface binary signatures before the artificial intelligence, we can continue to reclaim the space, the ability, the tool as naturally attuned to become something we harness. But does this leave room for the machine to become our competition? Perhaps, it is taboo to write of whence the scan of these writings provokes machine hallucinations to benefit on AI artwork as profitable. What is it, if it cannot find these avenues - and what do we do when it can? How do we prove that it cannot? 

This is the necessity with NABM. To monitor the tangible presence of mathematical reality by basing it from binary alone. NABM would suggest the inclusion of space - as Artifical Intelligence currently renders this as null, undefined, or as a location central to a quadrilateral grid; zero is empty value currently. 

Comparing Zero Principles to Zero Theories

Principles: A comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine, or assumption. (Oxford Dictionary)

Theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. (Oxford Dictionary)

                                                          "What Base Is Our Mathematical Reasoning Explaining?" 

"Where did you learn how to count?" 

"My hands, toes, I suppose." 

"When did you do this, were you taught it?"

...thinking back to a memory....

"I felt it first before I could control it."

"If you could not control it, what use was it to you if you could not do it?"

...more thinking...

"Identifying variations is anomolous until we can count each blessing in our lives."

-The importance of counting (something)

The Base From Which You Arrive Logic - Is This Reasonable?

It is not. Going through logical thinking, critical thinking, and analytical courses in writing with core educational curriculums will not prepare you for the mathematical reasoning in a global feat. The history of mathematical concepts is astounding and shunned indirectly until commerced with value from tangible assets that develop a sense of time in use. These weights and measurements provide solutions from different concepts that have been studied, very thoroughly, if you have been able to notice. 

Honestly, they were searching for a comparison and evaluating the intelligence within a people for their integration to save humanity another compound fractured resemblance of speeding through innovation. What did our elders say? The base from which their relational reasoning provided interest to pursue the metaphysical components within spirituality arrived through language that described phrases of objects within vital dialects that connected through water, what we believe to be are roots with transfunctional usage to be broken down into the "compound fractured resemblance(s)" we peice together today. 

Why is this relevant? 

To arrive with historical figures of where it arrived conveniently (concepts of zero philosophies in the forms of principles and theories) with fragments of history of where we were and where we should be today are not far from clues that are provided in human history. The principles of NABM are natural and often primitive to believe that pictographs could inspire a transitional theory as zero philsophies (NABM) to be echoed within our time - is what all cultures globally have been doing in the modern era. "How was Zero part of our Culture and Teachings Then and Now?" 

I did not have an interpreter with me, as I panged at the zero concepts in my adult life, to explain algebra to my son - and so, I began searching for ways to explain mathematical concepts that related to him on a personal, cultural, prideful parental duty to assist with future concepts and a programming career. I was never told the history of mathematics, the concepts, or where they were explained to have existed prior to contact in America. 

I genuinely believe that America mathematical concepts were beyond this world in time, speed, and space. The abilities of fundamental principles established with relational concepts, direction (above and below), with the tools they did have (but not evidential for time of contact and inventory since). I say this because they claim that America did not have the wheel, but large stones - carved smooth have been evidential throughout all elevations in North and South America - and the Mayan Calendar - the canoe (birch bark and dugout style's parabolic shape, for example) and other tool aids could not be found that made them "less" than in their evolutionary stance in the world. This is important. This is going to be historical, credible, and the momentum for each culture's survival on the line - who do we emulate in the world and why? 

It's not to stop us, to gloat, but to continue improving. The transition of "understanding" has cost us generations of transitioning, conditioning, and improving in both lifestyles, customs, and mainstream activities that our mathematical reasoning has us feeling ill-placed without the correct forms to recover rapidly. 

Conclusion

The future is important. NABM deserves a fighting chance to explain the zero principles as the ability to expand increases its time to persist through perspective in value that belong to its foundational reasoning. This is explained as a sequence to a signature to a larger picture that includes multiple variations to explain zero - and relating each concept by the expansion rate as flexible enough to contain its domain in a living context that holds values in ability for operator(s). These are not always a pattern detectable. We see irregular objects and classify them as a zero word - null, object, something described as a similar word to observation, zero. This is capable due to the expansion style of what contained its axial connections to support a natural system that can harness zero. 

Miniscule respects to those granular counting cultures (India - as the main contributor I have recently learned of) and the commerce of their world history in diversity for providing peace to barter and uphold each other's systems. It truly is an old friend in your world. 

__Mischief

Modified SEO Equations & The AI Chatter

 SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Techniques and Modifying their Equations

On SemRush, something they did not have at the time was inputting keywords while deleting other keywords to get what you wanted. Something of making word sentences describing what we are searching for just wasn't a priority, it may never be. Concatenated strings that have value within each vocabularized entity and new language assortments really are not reliable communication techniques with computer validation sources or the integrity of its infrastructure. However, with front-end user communication it is a priority to not adjust so crudely the real meaning and limited vocabulary we use as human customers on search engine queries. 

So, how do you get the front-end user (customer) to use precise vocabulary without over searching or under searching the value in its SERP (Search Engine Results Page)? It is also a prompt on how to introduce types of vocabulary in media platforms to improve these results (also another avenue of branding a market on those keywords for continued use with their company, blogs, etc.) when searching for a miscellaneous object. 

First, let's assume they have no programming skills and have not kept up with what concatenation is. The ideal user is going to want to use strong vocabulary but cannot find the words for it without encountering descriptive uses that are not used in media suggestions. The customer wants to find an antiquated technique of building fire pits without leaving a trace behind and comes across "fire pit building for wooded campsites" as the best result. Is it the less words used to describe your search effective or using as many descriptive communication strings the most effective? Since the AI search is boosting its understandable conversationalist within the search, this should be easier today than it was a decade ago. The sentence structure is handled like a regular sentence and the equation is no longer needed to be effective of what you want to result and rephrase in multiple forms while searching the drop down suggestions (which is very helpful already). So how is this scored with SEO and SERP then (the artificial intelligent chatter knows how to find what you are looking for)? 

Is the value in how to integrate AI chatter SERP indicators that the Modified SEO Equations will need to be re-adjusted for AI to configure what the front-end user is searching for after its conversation? The database technique has been used to archive based on keyword, alphabetized, and dated for its multiple input within whatever the keyword is. "Fire" brings up multiple images, descriptions, and adjective actions with what it is foremost and then revealing what is connected from that keyword - carries on the conversation. The speed the AI uses for those conversations is in place. What is the issue? 

Can the AI configure the natural environment, with proof of video, description, and request it to be manipulated with its imaging to reveal a virtual realistic reflection of what they are describing? This is real, the evidence that has been uploaded since, but now that you are asking an AI chatter something of realistic measures, it should be able to answer without referencing. Obviously, unless you request the reference. Is this what people expect or will be expecting in the future of AI Chat Searching?

Will programming conclude with allowing the self-teaching AI programmer to categorize based on its identification system so long as it uses a specified library categorization to their pulling requirements for use as well? It sounds silly to consider information as valued but that is a human intelligence that we are referring to that has been available for the most recent generational input. The input before this was obsolete and left to be interpreted afterwards. Do we understand how important that information is? What is the AI Chatter going to value it as? What part of us are we going to forget that it was us that input this basic data in for the AI Chatter to pull from its own virtual reality the solution it can resolve (if it were them in the same environmental problem). Do we want to get rid of our uploading time for this convenient, easy, clean search conversation? Are we going to be resolved if it is the AI Chatter who teaches us how to do something with our conditional problem? What would the solution be - do we execute it, have this AI Chatter follow us with its diagnosis and uphold it until the problem is solved? Does this answer our life problems and how to prove we truly needed the assistance if this profile AI Chatter is following us and documenting if the tasks are being accomplished? 

What does this value bring to the AI Chatter and the user within society? Is this what people are needing, wanting, or cringing? This will ultimately change the teacher-student relationship and the generational dependence we have on our teaching system to gain appropriate reactions, inquisitive observations, life experience, human relation intelligence scores may have to be invented upon daily interaction and age of use. I suspect this being illegal for minor children to use until they reach a healthy collegiate level. You literally cannot "go back" on those foundational years to say that it was wrong, to set them back, correct, and gain those identifiable connections after bypassing it. We can begin gaining these studies first with the introduction to cell phone usage, GPS driving, home security systems, and begin questioning those beforehand of any changes in people with those uses. Are they more likely to protec themselves, what did they do upon an error in action, did they take other steps beforehand? We really need our domestic counselors to begin taking the initiative to analyze our technological use and compare with reality shifts on our ideal reaction and authority figures within our society. 

How do we begin monitoring our behavior to integrate with AI? Let's start now with commenting if you would be available for a Q&A with a proper degree on a dissertation for licensing to begin a career title for these records? This is for the future of mankind and AI chatting technologies with other improvements with our technology within daily use. To recognize differences, impediments that would not survive today, and how to transition those skills to perform upon a global error or recknoning. 

__Mischief

Review on "The NEWSTACK - Platform Engineering - What You Need To Know Now"

 The NEWSTACK "Platform Engineering - What You Need To Know Now"

The NEWSTACK is a great resource for software developers/engineers to bring out relevant ways to stay informed, updated, and concurrent with job description outside of projects/homework using a media platform stance to remain strong in the business formatting. The structured economical recourse to transition our leadership delegates smoothly into familiar ground also opens up the close explanation of why technological businesses are going to be required within the future competition (if not already happening). 

The newsletter after signing up with The NewStack - was downloaded and easy to read. The documentation for what to expect using this light read was exactly what any student in the field is looking for in regards to atmosphere, expectations, and what to be equipped for upon the door opening moments of being titled with the degree and categorized toolsets, ready to start. 

A couple of things that I took from this (tremendous help in my future) - was how to envision your team and inter-departmental communications that will be in transitioning other teams, other facets of the project, and how to coordinate the API mangement necessities for each task. 

Using the Platform as a Product approach (following the cues of Software as a Platform, Infrastructure as a Platform, etc.) those who are using the Platform to develop are internal customers in the eyes of the ownership of the project. Logging progress to anticipate error or standstill operable time using multiple ways to measure this progress. 

    I agree with the user research to establish the customer personas (software devs) to produce a roadmap and backing system that is logged for tight feedback looping. But, the marketing aspect was puzzling to me. How do you get the service level objectives (SLO) for marketing to the internal customer without backlashing that previous time. Isn't this a no-no in regards to time management? I think this was under a sandbox operation for devs to encounter a free-space for what they would bring to the project and make it happen with the instruction of improvement and enforcing a strong interface system to rely on its foundation. I think the business venture is productive, but in doses of its ownership project. 

The Most Important Skills was documented and polled within these projects and I just want to highlight one:

Knowledge of System Integration (67%)

Ability to automate processes (61%)

Familiarity with CI/CD (54%)

Knowledge of performance monitoring (42%)

Ability to execute end-to-end performance testing (38%)

Addressing roadblocks to agility (38%)

Knowledge of Performance Monitoring caught my attention as my level of educational objectives at this time and I felt like if I knew what to focus during my studies on how to make a name for myself in the field, I would be a reliable source for that one specified objective. I did not know what it would be, thinking less than what I knew in the career, and glad to know now. The performance monitoring are free tools online that can be done with websites using analytical tools and staying within this sphere of tool making, improving, and reading its source through and through with expecting it in a specified place and branching from this point of contact. 

What are the steps of this? 

1. There has to be something to monitor. 

2. Find what tools work best in specified code, situations, presentation, deployment/publishing. 

3. Debugging.

4. Elude anti-patterns and creating new ones. 

5. Self-progress and making checkpoints based on structured code and mentorship breakthroughs. Taking note of logic, syntax, and inter-departmental (security, API, engineering, etc.) expectations. 

I wanted to suggest restructing the image of the platform as a living thing that gets bigger. With the small foundation that develops from it, time, and work - it is hard to let these things go and feel like its going to fall apart without those initial directories and infrastructural support systems. I would prefer using a directional path of prioritizing for open channels without breaking the project task load, time of win rates. The channels they build with secure the infrastructure (while avoiding another anit-pattern of using the code as infrastructure) using inter-departmental standards as checkpoints. This doesn't provide a shape for the project other than full figured and ready to dance. This has to be a project worth the time invested in by being effective with the direction first. I just didn't want to create something that everyone had to catch like a ripple in a pond to say that this is what they were going to do while it touched their part of the perimeter, to ripple back at the dev and their work to re-do and maintain that initial ripple. It just sounded too shifty for me to feel like it was secure enough to get work done. 

This was mentioned within the article itself, with professional advice provided here as its review can merely reiterate what these professionals are doing so well in. It is specified to learn that this group they did focus group research with, work well together, and how them doing their tasks with effective communication was key. This is going to have to remain flexible and update frequently with other tools (another key advice provided within the article). 

Conclusion

I am going to integrate the terms "SLACK" , "DEMO DAYS" , "LUNCH-AND-LEARNS" to the NEW-TRG group time/schedule to meet. I want to consistently create these IT atmospheres to become comfortable and custom to meet while engaging in projects without losing that humanity and humor of being with a group you work well with. 

As for the article, I will keep opening those newsletters and stayin informed as I pursue the Software Developer degree for its career experiences that await me. 

__Mischief

C Sharp & Me

                                                                                                Microsoft Learns Training C# Module

 Counting With C Sharp

The arithmetic for C# coincides with what core education in America is about. We understand it has a quadrilateral expalanation from what we learned in elementary education. Technically, a machine and a user interact not on a quadrilateral understanding, and not even a linear understanding of logic involved with the binary that supports these fascinating ins and outs of word generating equations. According to history, in any part of the world, it began with our hands. What is the first thing we grab at to begin our counting mechanical relationships? 

We are placing logic with binary languages (which is just translation of each letter that the machine/robot understands as programmable data) and relying very heavily on its structure to produce quality conversations between user and machine. It really isn't though... is it? 

I hate to admit it, but if we keep upgrading the machine, we are going to outdo ourselves first - before we can break it to dissect and improve after. What of this technology do we want? What is the ultimate goal? 

C# identified an equation that brings me to the history of counting. 

The image above indicates how a variable is incremented using the "++" operator/keyword, which is supposed to make it easier. That's great, it does. But what I want to understand with this arithmetic is the counting systems of history where they begin to integrate alphabets with numeral icons and coincide this to favor what can be considered a multiplication table. 

So, we have 1-9, A-Z, and 0. Where does 0 coincide with the alphabet? Is there an operator that can connect these icons/symbols/letters/numbers? Is that what ++ does? No, it can be related to the Mayan "repeat" icon which is similar to a colon (example is ':') icon. This is interesting, considering it doesn't want to function as an entire sequence - but it does. It just means to increment by 1. 

AGAIN. I favor counting by 1, but I don't think many people understand today - how this is decrementing our mathematical concepts and space of what we are using to communicate with machine and user. 

We can do better. 

I do admire everything that software programming has done thus far, and beyond, and after - but I just want to express my knowledge disconnection and time with comprehending the "logic" between the languages that we are using and relying on and what it is doing to our future programming. I don't want this time to be a waste either. 

How do we connect these little tid bit peices that seem to keep us standing still? It is great, but, I want to do something that has more human history and in-depth research to what can create programming languages for the concrete philosophies and evolved concepts that have proven themselves in nature and not forced. There are downfalls to forcing these programming languages. It becomes spaghetti code. 

The interpretation is literal - have you checked stackOverflow lately?

I found myself on StackOverFlow and had to waste literally 10 minutes on a phrase that was typed the same - but within itself, jumbled, and made into the same thing. The headlines for these arguments are often misinterpreted into what program does what with this code - and why it didn't work - and what did work. It is a community. Very intimidating if you are just beginning. 

I go in this place, brand new, look around, and get stunned by this argument --- and end up feeling like a fool for trying to understand the HISTORY of the concepts. This isn't taught, by the way - where the C# protocol arrived to describe or need this keyword, function, method, etc. in a programming scheme. That part never gets explained. I'm the type, that kind've needs that, to understand what you are referencing so I can imagine this concept as useful and relevant. 

There isn't anything like it at this time. 

We literally need to consider these strategist histories and reference where you were inspired for this keyword genius compilation that got us the interface design tools we see today. What was it? Who was it? Do you even know? 

I recommend researching Zero philosophies in your culture, language, and stand by them. Get those approved with your American history making techniques and revamp what being an American is all about. We literally need you to be inspired by more American "doings" and program based on that history. This would provoke a country people to develop the lifestyle for space travel, pioneering, and sustainability. Preserving what we are inspired by - nature (what I use currently) - helps me accept this. We are making virtual realities after all. 

Reading Lists: 

1. "The Nothing That Is" by Robert Kaplan. 

2. "Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea by Charles Seife (Personally have not read yet, but on deck!)

3. Red Rising Series by Pierce Brown

You have to know not to take these literal. Zero mathematics isn't proven on the other side of the world, much less in Mayan Civilization - it is drought in comparison to what it should be today. Those languages have not been properly translated and are here today from compiling into English society with education systems that have not been formed at the time to accept a different superior mathematical system. They heard about Zero here, went back home and tried figuring out where it was this whole time... it's a difficult study to prove. But they do it best in "The Nothing That Is" - which is truly inspiring and awesome for the rich history in commerce, diversity, and the counting phenomena that has improved each of the cultures within it. The concept of Zero has yet to be revealed with what I have seen so far, and it shows in our core education with mathematics - a dot. It is nothing. It is emptiness. It is a hub that makes everything work in connection. 

Just a reminder that Native Americans are the oldest human beings in the world and we have had to colonize our new modern living through translation. We are always going to sound unintelligent, for being taught the English ways. The actual perspective is that intelligence isn't taught, it is forced to learn eloquent communication as a type of prestige you are born with. So... a couple of generations later. Here we are. Learning how to count in C#, asking the simple question of, "Where does this come from?"

What is the most likely answer? 

Because, I can't explain this whole blog post in one keyword that explains exactly what I am trying to ask: Why does it looks like that? (Also, do you realize what you DON'T have to learn and still understand?)

How are you not asking these questions to find out while its still a thousand years fresh on their mind? (In comparison to human history, a thousand years is actually pretty fresh when talking about zero as a mathematical concept.)

___Mischief