Synopsis
Any language broken down to communicate effectively uses English for Lamens base to use as an agreeable understanding. This is not everywhere, but for this example, it is. The idea of prefix, suffix, roots, phrase groups for event, verbs, identifiers, objects, and the ever mentioned before "Indian Name" for one noun, are language structures I am familiar with. As I am learning new terminology with Software Programming and its languages, I often times find myself imagining something totally different than described.
Something that should be pre-learned, not available currently in the 'common knowledge' is the string theory being used. I am in a lack of knowledge for string theory and have not believed in it, ever. I had a parent that grew up in that knowledge with public school and she turned out to be an American custom, strong-willed, good woman. But we could never see eye-to-eye on certain things, and it reflected our mentalities and decision making in dramatic differences.
What were the programmers thinking and why it takes me longer to learn software programming langauges...
I assume that the software programmers are influenced by their tradition, culture, separate language systems and histories. It is unknown to me, mostly. So, when they describe a syntax term, I hesitate and have to separate my instilled knowledge and revert to American history and have just come to the conclusion that this is a world history, I may be learning, in language choices.
Asynchronous
This term is used with the
Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await subject with learn.microsoft.com with Visual Basic. This isn't color coded either, so it can be difficult to switch from term, action, phrase for purpose, and descriptions that correlate system input/output and the interactions with the system. The tooltip doesn't always describe it the best either. It is hard for images to be used, because it's a software programming language. It can show you the result, but that isn't what you want to see when learning this as a bilingualist and separate culture based in an evolved context from a rare inclusive modern perspective.
People that learn these languages are basically detached from social interactions and focused on dissecting language of syntax, development, and connecting system functions from machine to user from their perspective is missing the poetic sense of something that is not described.
These developers went through something called a religious attainment, without a church that would reveal an amazing feature - nobody in the world had. However, I see things missing in the occasion, and understand why they retreated to their homeland and cultural or religious advisers. Something happened, and they cannot describe it.
So, when they use the term "Asynchronous" the facet is revealing to us, that this tool began to evolve an image within this developer to describe an aeronautical height here on earth (this is on earth too, but those are already observed and described in that missing image). The erroneous descriptions we use for signals and pathways must admit that they are working with something not as unpredictable as lightning formations. (How this is stated, refers to negative context - usually wrong. Not to assume the opposite. People would fix this statement to read positive. This is a double context of phrase being used to describe one statement. The implied versions created the asynchronized context of "wrong descriptions for signals and pathways" - electrical... "something not as unpredictable" - electrical is man-made... lightning formations - unpredictable pathways, relate signals to electrical current in control while natural conditions contain lightning to thunderstorms.) They mean to say, within their domain. Asynchronous within one domain is not the same within another domain that the programming object can transfer by way of interpretation for using methods as suggested.
In the image above, GetStringAsync is a method with an object of time to conduct action. It refers to a return call with the object changed from domain value and programming that is of a data type "string" to use. I had so many issues describing and understanding this, I literally had to laugh about it, in a serious way - and go slower so I could imagine it.
GetStringAsync
Image above, last explanation: "Instead, the string result is stored in the task that represents the completion of the method, GetStringTask. The assignment statement assigns the retrieved result to urlContents."
So, after describing the method GetStringAsync - I understood it perfectly. However, I had to put my background away and imagine it as they did.
I would have translated with mine to imagine the domain space separated by task that became the compiler to decide what it is shaping. There is no invisible barrier, or distance, but you see directly as evident as any original method can be used like the GetStringTask method. It is copying the method and using it in storage within another domain space to use, new term, GetStringAsync.
When this is going to be used - it will be described later: GetStringAsync.
I read the term and imagine the try catch statements. I also don't believe the establishment of time on internet, offline and online services or cyberspace to be explained yet. Time in natural observations is celestial. Within the cyber domains, it hasn't been established to my knowledge yet - if it has, I do not know. Don't ruin it. Progressive thinking is being capable to contend with unknown facets and can distribute those terminologies to thin further into definitive measurements.
I read this like an "Indian Name" and found the answer within it. Containers of space as range or domain provided the method action purpose. However, I did not like how the connection of these actions are explained. They have to be called from storage, and are using a raw source in method ability with new labels - I want to make sure that they are going through barriers and upholding those barriers within to contain storage capabilities. This part was unexplained.
The GetStringAsync also provided the implied context to not be indicated. It describes a constant unknowing direction upon interaction within any program. It being used from GetStringTask to GetStringAsync does not suffice.
Solutions within the given parameters: Examine the binary and coordinate effective practices to utilize NABM (Native American Binary Mathematics) designs to specify operators and the appropriate abilities to them for variables to remain variables, objects to remain objects, and storage to have size.
Reprogramming these keywords to puzzle together is not enough security or integrity to design of structure - its thin, hard to detect errors, and can be corrupted. It is also easily recoverable data to infect with these known methods and tasks within its moving data streams of communication.
With the solution, a binary interface design keeps the ability of operators, objects, value, and can organize an image of what is happening and shaping while using other facets of asynchronous functions to shape what they are programming. The designs so far with NABM, can map arithmetic functions and explain mathematical premise of binary to limited transitions, which do not change in sequence for integrity of these domains. There is no loophole to circumvent. It is not assigned the value - which does not create more memory space for it - since those are contained within the designated domain of the interface design using binary. It is being able to program the design while the binary supports those commands.
This can also help imagine what they are trying to design, build, and otherwise program by having a base binary interface to manipulate. There are borders, designated mathematical approaches to secure how something is happening, and is replaceable upon corruption - very effectively.
www.nabm.info
A peer-review blog on the subject that is in development. The religious curriculum and story behind NABM are separate. The peer-review is to recruit developers, Native American inter-tribal people to put forth efforts in mathematical designs, stories, and histories to translate. Learning to integrate how interpretation can affect technological establishments is necessary. Every culture has input and can, in America. One of the weaker standpoints in Native American culture has been mathematically explaining measurements for standardized recollection for tool purposes and reference. They were natural. This did not change, we just had to translate so others could relate, and now that we have modern Native Americans who can transcribe old text - they must be capable of natural observation and use.
Learn by the Hand Sized Bowl
Asynchronous does not state a starting point, or end point, just the context of filepath. Objects or events are the detection of change that are being recognized in the same location, as having separate uncoordinated time. They grow at different rates! The term itself, is observing (possibly the same kind of object or event) separation internally as opposed to external conditions.
With that said, the image of this phenomenon - may not be describing what is actually happening, yet.
You want something to happen but need to retrieve an ability in storage to use outside with a similar name. You want the source to call to you, to use, and never send back without it knowing. You are going to change the name and build a new storage, to call later. This is a string expansion?
It is also not its name. Electrical currents, signals, and events are separated to move from one point to the next in filepath designations.
Does this not create error in delay of time, stopped time, and create a vulnerable source code?
Delay is pending a return - it can also render this inoperable or valueless since its ultimate pending time cannot fully complete its purpose.
Stopped time is contradiction of process for giving and taking equal amounts in storage used.
What does this do to the source code in the system for running optimizations? Is this why we need to constantly update?
Conclusion
Tell me now so I can focus more on developing NABM than learn multiple manipulative coding techniques on delaying time, time again, and re-using the source codes by secondary and tertiary formats to delay time further. Jump starting systems to life because we are missing the point.
The hand sized bowl had something hot poured in it, handled from hand to hand until cool enough to eat. I showed up unprepared, that was what a woman told me to do, in a place of gathering community people. I opened my hands, toggled, and left satisfied in belly, heart, mind, spirit. I am hoping that further development can be made - so that more encounters like this can happen. I learned how to use what I got and in its most primal form - I felt, happy.
That's why we learn from each other - people. Within time - asynchronously speaking - you delay the inevitable from happening until you forget what you were delaying, and it becomes a habit, job, title. Structures are made from it and that is when we have a real problem to clean up.
