WASET

 World Academy of Science, Engineering, & Technology Abstract Paper

The World Academy of Science, Engineering, & Technology (WASET) has provided an open-source library for scholarly papers to be submitted in hopes of being printed with their journals with remarks made by professionals in the field and highlighted as research induction with your subject. It is a sharing moment with the world, to contribute as a scholar, and be accepted within the community of Science, Engineering & Technology! 

I am submitting an abstract paper with the January deadline and June deadline for Native American Binary Mathematics in the Technology field for computing research. I highlighted it as a cultivational tool for the binary interfaces we currently use. The technique I want to write in, will still be in copyright format, and upheld (through research, global copyright depends on its home-based Country and their laws for protecting those works which also qualifies for a tribal resource for Native American rights in culturally preserved knowledge) in its protected form. However, once I release it, it will be for the world to use or not use. Archived for repair, scrutiny, and comment. 

The paper is submitted, in a poster format (2 forms and virtual or physical presence during presentation) - which is like a visual aid in power points to explain/teach your concept/theory/research topic. This is with a registration fee and a moderator that reviews your abstract paper to revise to their standards. I recommend reading the scholar journal styles (APA and MLA are writing templates, Scientific standard is a little bit more detailed and less emotional) and getting familiar with language used, constructing the concepts in the language used, and demonstrating figures using software only. No free-hand versions are allowed for scientific or mathematical equations. 

Anyone can submit in the world. Papers are uploaded and put through the process annually with multiple ports to choose from, in subject and location. I am choosing the London (UK) location because I plan on being in the area for June of 2024 to attend personally (if my scholarship gets approved). I don't know how many accounts of this there is, but I know that the Mayan/Oltecs/Mexicans did introduce zero concepts that caused a Paradigm Shift from their mathematical prowess. This is not the same, but, an American concept no less. 

Native American Mathematical History

The basic questions:

1. How did you learn to count?

2. What is your counting system? (10-Base, 20-Base, etc.)

3. When did you develop this system?

4. Can you explain your concepts mathematically?

5. How do you understand theory?

6. What is your idea of mathematical time?

7. Is mathematics a science of nature, can you explain it in this way?

8. What did you use counting for?

9. Do you manipulate mathematically?

10. Navigating mathematics with daily life, please explain. 

Some of the basic foundations of mathematics in Native American history did not account these subjects and were left to mythic, creationism, spiritual, medicinal, respectful, and holistic approaches of a connection with the sustenance provider and its extensions as people. The intelligence of relating animalistic viewpoints to survive and political stance within tribal organization and jurisdiction relied on daily living examples. 

The language translations, interpretations and lost knowledge with interpretation had disconnected generational descriptions that had to be refound without instruction, guidance, or generational emotion. The land itself was what connected our lost identities to impact our definitive purposes. It is true, it is more than sustenance, and still teaches us to this day. 

Language was and still is, a huge obstacle to overcome. While translating relational concepts of universal existence using binary - the creationism became part of the directional embedding that occurs with any time being explained. The turtle's back, the descending touches to the world, the perspectives, the time of day. These range throughout the Americas and are part of the explanation of its people and its sustenance. Time is mostly rememebered from the Plains tribes, who satisfied the metaphysical approaches from wise elders who had conversations about the moment in time that something happens. They were really asking, did you know about the lunar calendric motions that are occuring, the color of it, the distance during this year and season, the star formations, the planetary positions, and the universal picture during your moment? What made this moment calculated? The terms were not grasped and left to "the moment in time" which explained categories of epiphany, vision-seeking, or otherwise metaphysical traits of sentient beings to describe perimeter connections made from environmental impacts. 

Other tribes, were not always unified in these concepts, and was recognized to be of different statuses within the group. Not everyone could think or see the world in these views. Some were supported, others were not. The proof of their knowledge was often considered supernatural or unexplained mysteries from the unknown boundaries beyond the safety of their group efforts. 

It sounded enthralling and invisible to value intangible concepts that could not be explained - even today! The words we have for it are either taboo or unknown. It is just old history that happened during a time of pre-recorded luxuries (migrational efforts, depending on the people, would keep them moving from seasonal camps, dietary restrictions in hunting/gathering availability, and resources) that was satisfied in lifestyle at the time. It is a difficult thing to break out of, once you know how things are done and can be explained in reality. 

So, with the rest of the world, we have crop counting, grain counting, commerce, storage capacity, and generalizations - which is a loss of memory in the language used. The turtle shell, harvesting tasks, and jewelry making were part of the counting tools. Celestial movements were ceremonious and storytelling remembrances. 

Beyond the basic principles of cultural lifestyles, we transition into modern core curriculum. This is peculiar because the mathematics that approaches comes from a different world history and concepts. The mathematical sense Native Americans possess was not linguistically inspired, just accepted as naturally attuned, and didn't require mathematical difference (because bartering was contended based on "like-people" who were jurisdictional to hunting and didn't change much from each contact). However, there are theories of accounts that South American travelers found the Mississippi River and traveled upstream to the Native American tribes of the Midwest. No easy task, taking the delta provided strenuous circumstances that were not easily mapped or remembered. The connections made with the land used are intangible values to consider for an amount of time to explain luck. It is not explained in the same sense as being asked, when, how long ago, and how do you know - what part of the story stated its mathematical presence to track? 

Native American Binary Mathematics (NABM) is going to explain their sense of mathematical connections in their natural environmental observations. Relational concepts using direction, acknowledgements of it, shapes, relational hierarchies as duties, and using these interface mappings to cultivate with equations and measurement tools. I say 'measurement tools' as a formation of NABM can be explained for a moment in its time, as to how it was constructed, from the very basic building block of zero and one. This relationship is then expanded into multiple formations, grasping multiple concepts of abilities to explain amount, degree, or otherwise strength of what it built because of its shape, size, and purpose. It naturally occurs. This is a sacredness being revealed that is simply stated as binary. 

Its creation is with nothing and in the world, it began with an empty container to explain what zero is. Other parts of the world, believe zero to be a hub, central to the middle of a wheel. In other domains, it was needed for the space, a period can do, to separate the next sequence of events or sentences. Here, and now, it is considered a back-end interface for which connects universal existence with abilities that its front-end components (nature itself) either designate a time for it, size it, or null its presence into another harvest of sustenance that the world itself absorbs in its death. Our world is sustained by zero ability and time reveals the expansion of this zero, and what it has connections with beyond our present moment. 

So... Now you know. The big secret we have been hiding until now. 

The next goal, is to unify the world, without losing its people. Accepting eco-friendly lifestyles and thinking of more than ourselves as capable of powerful things and decisions (inventions, accomplishments) is part of the process that so many cultures in the world already possess. However, the main agenda for America now is unifying its Country people to believe in its Country to possess the skills to be people beyond racial identifiers - for our potential and not for peaceful reasons. I am right in my beliefs and it has taken over a decade to configure the proper person to represent this curriculum and its purpose. 

Entering WASET will provide more global input and hopefully it will help explain a directional potential that will be referenced in future works regarding planetary preservation and software designs. Especially with explaining the environmental connections with Artificial Intelligence and making connections with machine. 

__Mischief

Episodes of Null Streaking Through The Memory Slots

 Binary Compositions Create A Venue

When zero is defined using basic arithmetic and the inevitable natural zero defines a self-taught machine that zero can be anybody it wants to... Just as long as you never look at your true 'one' and believe them. 

The realistic measures of a zero and being surrounded by a vast identity crises of 'ones' in every graphical slot is the immeasurable theory that zero cannot consume its space. If space were to prevail in the composition of 'one' abilities, the value of it goes missing and is left to space instead. Zero, being zero, does not move. The creep is lurking around trying to figure out how to attack this zero, from the inside...

In the month of October, we have just got done witnessing four Supermoons in a row, within three months, and gearing up for a Solar Eclipse. How is this not an immemorial time to recollect what we did during these months leading up into the awesome natural phenomenon that we dare not become entangled with the calm space that surrounds us to escape 'the creep' trying to get in the moment you reveal your zero ability. <cough> I mean, if that's your thing, in nerd stuff with big words and even bigger ambitions of future career goals like being the first to dominate in a programming language or straddle the moon with a counting diplomacy. What are we excited for right now, as Americans? Watching the Indians in an untouched hemisphere of the moon THE ENTIRE TIME THIS IS GOING ON on OUR SIDE OF THE PLANET! Literally. Think about this. This may or may not have been planned, but that is the most awesome job to be thinking of while living daily life. <cough> Still excited about that Jupiter trip though.

So, before you go and let it all out, just recollect the big boom theory. As soon as that zero believed it was safe to let go, that 'one' was released into a mayhem that is theoretically unknown. So, with that being said, I introduce to you my theory on the Big Bang. 

When a zero is catatonic to circumference as axial is to memory with space and location, the null streak (new terminology here, not typical to use "null" but since it is known in programming, I'm going to lift it up beyond the cusp of the constructor we sometimes leave empty handed as it finally descends and crashes a system.                 ......................................................................................................................

                                    The 'one' stability of maintaining zero, rips. This reality is strongheld by zeroes inability to grasp what is dormant in 'one' and 'space' for being incapable of axial location and being thinly placed to believe its depth is known or sought for. They technically do not exist without zero. Zero, may or may not know this, but its the premise of its nature to baffle 'one' and 'space' in the same sense. Why does it not go chasing? Why does it not leave its central position? Why does 'one' ability have absence with 'zero' so that it is a natural balance in dominance and domain? 

When history revealed their zero to the world and its measurements within commerce, counting, and weight to measure in tangible efforts to prove its place within cultural beliefs and solutions with - the deprived theory of extermination was not known until pollution. It wasn't accepted until humans understood they were capable of destroying an entire species. Upon this finding, the 'one' factor arose to claim these natural sense of curious engagers who claim contact and dominance for multiple effects in destruction. The fragile wilt. The ecosystem is changed. 

The observation of a natural appearance in this study is finding an embracing heir to follow into location and dominance. Zero reigns in place for without internal digestive rations to supercede with 'one' and manipulating its claim to destroy and internally weaken this ecosystem, we would be called what? Null, is a strong word here. If Null claimed to be zero, it would be streaking through the space and stars like a log lost in the woods on nothing but downhill momentum. We see this in gravity observations, the small push to accelerate it, and the dangers of it afterwards. Null, is something like this, not Zero. 

Null does not occupy due to the time of its evidence. I am preparing for the SQL transition here as I explain what Null is (to me). It is incapable of housing, they don't say why, is 10/10 times related to zero without explanation - - - - - but I need to resolve this term. Null is not occupied due to its inability to become an ecosystem. Where fragile is capable of moving one keystone species into the next era of keystone species and each respective ecosystem that supplies what will be provided for (we see this in so many proof of earth history species and its flora/fauna effects). This does not explain what happens to the time that escapes regeneration and adaptation. The age is just evident, happens almost like a sliver of time, and immediately robust in natural explosions that supply a radically different species/era of sustenance. So, Null, being its expansively speedy self in determining its ability with 'one' and 'space' are able to catch these moments in earth time to reveal nothing saved to remember them by. 

The idea of null was the concept of nothing and the ability to reveal nothing as an answer, of any scholar conclusion could be equipped with during the explanations that persist with change. I think we feel attuned to rest with nothing or null and satisfied with the peace to feel balanced in neutrality. This is not neutral, but we cannot see evidence yet, of how this can be explained in useful terms (yet). 

These are seen on rock formations, the age of trees, the separations of layers, whether they be growing marks or surface erosions of change - are within strands of change. Evident to believe its just one layer after the other. You know that is too dramatic of a change to accept. Right? So what happens here? Well, a long time ago, there were stories of what this universe was, and in those stories, the people, the animals, the characters had a life that is invisible to what we consider realistic in reality observations. That means, the people existed before this world was done creating itself (naturally) and with that amount of time that was used to survey its entirety, became the collection of the world we see and live today. 

Now, at this point, you have to ask yourself - where in my human historical concepts does this fit and where in my modern perspective is this going to fit? That thing, right there, is what we will never classify as a time to explain repair, adaptation, or regenerative balance. Those are very important to consider in any reality and subconscious state when dealing with death theories, natural phenomenon occurences (like right now), and universal concepts that infinity dwells the expanse in every balancing direction. 

This is a zero concept, the collection of an ecosystem for known characters in a place all its own. Peiced together, by strands of thin cracks, by strands of thin hairlines, by strands of particle based layering in filtration systems to confuse the 'one' into momentum controlled defeat (raining). So, when you look at us, miniscule to universe, we are nothing but globs of time stuck together, bound into purpose of something living. 

Alright. If you can believe that... 

Zero vs. Null - It depends on what the goal is. Are you in? Then, it could be null (Yes, I know they say its not possible). Zero (Yes, I know they say its not possible) it might be. What I can believe is, the place everyone has made for it. Do you know where it is, do you know what it does to you, do you know what to do if it were that creep... Trying to get in? Its October, after all, and we all know how you get when the moon is full and its friday, <look both ways fast> the thirteenth? [I just freaked myself out for there actually being a Friday the 13th this year]. 

So, what do you want to be filled with before you go boom? Something that 'one' can claim - which is empty time, the space that filled those memory slots with 'when I get there' attitude... it'll happen. Eventually. 

Then, the big bang theory happened. But, it was this concept and material, as to how we have our ecosystem and the zero is unnanounced to the cusp that we are contained for the 'one' getting in. All that space is, empty time and speed that is determined by the object size and attraction to pull it - change its course - should be thought of again. Think about this, we just accepted space is space but we forget that it must have a story to reckon our existence in intellectualism with something that any reality can fracture and peice back together. 

At the end of this story, it breaks - put it back together? One time? Universe? Is that what it means? When does recording happen? Then what? Does it break again? So, we work with natural breaking, fragments, and accept the zero concepts of null and memory. 

This is perfect for those that are programming, how they are doing what makes sense, naturally. Did they know this directly or by chance? Does it have a name. 

___Mischief

2023 Is Only Almost Over... Update On NABM!

 NABM (Native American Binary Mathematics)

This is the ground-up attempt of relational environment realities influencing interpretive binary configurations for a truly virtual experience that can separate the robotic/artificial intelligence and humanity/natural reality. This is a learned inclusion of creating a language that is not over-powered by one side or the other (machine and user/programmer) and involves passages of binary signatures with their own domain to cause its programming etiquette to relay within these mapping systems how the machine will understand its reality is binary. 

This can be multi-dimensional signatures that create an ability of how that domain is connected - without maintaining one-dimensional (x,y) grids to compare with arcs and fish-lensing where distance cannot explain its current existence in time known. The time we have in virtual spaces is not defined properly, at this time. This is cause for concern when we consider AI able to self-teach amongst the human hours of database designs and creating something that can do what a human programmer can do - which is create a tool within cyber library data banks, heirloom it, and build without clearance - as undetected communication systems go unchallenged due to the tool-making in open source code. [Which is still being learned and not fast enough by my standards.]

If I could critique, it would be too soon, the connection with NABM and current programming models creates the sense of complete upon another techno-tool in a onesie. I can't take these things apart anymore, I cannot break it and expect myself to fix it, I cannot replace with what I have in my own keeping. Not even duct tape? How are basic machine operations and purchase histories not mandatory consumer knowledge on repairing by now? How is this not important to America as consumers? I think we want to become dependent on our purchasing powers rather than our solving dilemma. We would be a different country and thinking of our technological components differently as well. 

NABM as the internal parts of explaining directional shapes in space with conditions as spatial combatants to present our experience with a new time, new tools, and new results of recognizing new domains. These signatures will be how we explain the expansion of zero, one, and the artifiicial mind who clings to its existence. If human reveals these interface binary signatures before the artificial intelligence, we can continue to reclaim the space, the ability, the tool as naturally attuned to become something we harness. But does this leave room for the machine to become our competition? Perhaps, it is taboo to write of whence the scan of these writings provokes machine hallucinations to benefit on AI artwork as profitable. What is it, if it cannot find these avenues - and what do we do when it can? How do we prove that it cannot? 

This is the necessity with NABM. To monitor the tangible presence of mathematical reality by basing it from binary alone. NABM would suggest the inclusion of space - as Artifical Intelligence currently renders this as null, undefined, or as a location central to a quadrilateral grid; zero is empty value currently. 

Comparing Zero Principles to Zero Theories

Principles: A comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine, or assumption. (Oxford Dictionary)

Theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. (Oxford Dictionary)

                                                          "What Base Is Our Mathematical Reasoning Explaining?" 

"Where did you learn how to count?" 

"My hands, toes, I suppose." 

"When did you do this, were you taught it?"

...thinking back to a memory....

"I felt it first before I could control it."

"If you could not control it, what use was it to you if you could not do it?"

...more thinking...

"Identifying variations is anomolous until we can count each blessing in our lives."

-The importance of counting (something)

The Base From Which You Arrive Logic - Is This Reasonable?

It is not. Going through logical thinking, critical thinking, and analytical courses in writing with core educational curriculums will not prepare you for the mathematical reasoning in a global feat. The history of mathematical concepts is astounding and shunned indirectly until commerced with value from tangible assets that develop a sense of time in use. These weights and measurements provide solutions from different concepts that have been studied, very thoroughly, if you have been able to notice. 

Honestly, they were searching for a comparison and evaluating the intelligence within a people for their integration to save humanity another compound fractured resemblance of speeding through innovation. What did our elders say? The base from which their relational reasoning provided interest to pursue the metaphysical components within spirituality arrived through language that described phrases of objects within vital dialects that connected through water, what we believe to be are roots with transfunctional usage to be broken down into the "compound fractured resemblance(s)" we peice together today. 

Why is this relevant? 

To arrive with historical figures of where it arrived conveniently (concepts of zero philosophies in the forms of principles and theories) with fragments of history of where we were and where we should be today are not far from clues that are provided in human history. The principles of NABM are natural and often primitive to believe that pictographs could inspire a transitional theory as zero philsophies (NABM) to be echoed within our time - is what all cultures globally have been doing in the modern era. "How was Zero part of our Culture and Teachings Then and Now?" 

I did not have an interpreter with me, as I panged at the zero concepts in my adult life, to explain algebra to my son - and so, I began searching for ways to explain mathematical concepts that related to him on a personal, cultural, prideful parental duty to assist with future concepts and a programming career. I was never told the history of mathematics, the concepts, or where they were explained to have existed prior to contact in America. 

I genuinely believe that America mathematical concepts were beyond this world in time, speed, and space. The abilities of fundamental principles established with relational concepts, direction (above and below), with the tools they did have (but not evidential for time of contact and inventory since). I say this because they claim that America did not have the wheel, but large stones - carved smooth have been evidential throughout all elevations in North and South America - and the Mayan Calendar - the canoe (birch bark and dugout style's parabolic shape, for example) and other tool aids could not be found that made them "less" than in their evolutionary stance in the world. This is important. This is going to be historical, credible, and the momentum for each culture's survival on the line - who do we emulate in the world and why? 

It's not to stop us, to gloat, but to continue improving. The transition of "understanding" has cost us generations of transitioning, conditioning, and improving in both lifestyles, customs, and mainstream activities that our mathematical reasoning has us feeling ill-placed without the correct forms to recover rapidly. 

Conclusion

The future is important. NABM deserves a fighting chance to explain the zero principles as the ability to expand increases its time to persist through perspective in value that belong to its foundational reasoning. This is explained as a sequence to a signature to a larger picture that includes multiple variations to explain zero - and relating each concept by the expansion rate as flexible enough to contain its domain in a living context that holds values in ability for operator(s). These are not always a pattern detectable. We see irregular objects and classify them as a zero word - null, object, something described as a similar word to observation, zero. This is capable due to the expansion style of what contained its axial connections to support a natural system that can harness zero. 

Miniscule respects to those granular counting cultures (India - as the main contributor I have recently learned of) and the commerce of their world history in diversity for providing peace to barter and uphold each other's systems. It truly is an old friend in your world. 

__Mischief

Digital Logic (Wiring Binary)

 Digital Logic: How machines interpret binary as an instruction!

                                                                                                                                                Adobe Asset

Creating Paths Using Truth Tables

Depending on the equation you are working with - this algebraic style of interpretation can be formatted for binary to construct the wiring diagram within a logic circuit demonstration to appease the original equation visually. 

The truth tables purpose rely on WHAT will work in the diagram by indicating its "HIGH" or "1" position and what that binary is. 

Example:

AB + C(inversed)

A          B          C          C(inversed)          AB          AB + C(inversed)

0           0          0           1                            0                    1

0           0          1           0                            0                    0

0           1          0           1                            0                    1

0           1          1           0                            0                    0

1           0          0           1                            0                    1

1           0          1           0                            0                    0

1           1          0           1                            1                    1

1           1          1           0                            1                    1

The binary truth table reveals the wiring diagram (which is a whole other task of finding the AND and NOT to inverse its C value) in an output which is found in the AB + C(inversed) section above. Every "1" that is categorized, indicates that it will work if you reference your inputs to be activated reading left to right. 

If you are in a software programming environment and cannot picture the logic behind some of the theorems, rules that isn't fully compatible with what has been drilled into you in your education journey of what is correct in algebra and basic mathematics - it pays off once you finally reach this point of understanding. The feeling is like living a lie. 

The madness behind logic with binary mathematical designs such as this require the basic components to reach a certain point and then prove itself afterwards by following these schemas to the very end. It is highly encouraged to participate in a Digital Logic course (multiple types if you can) and let the task of completion excite you at your own pace (finally - if you struggled thus far with living a lie). 

This is a basic binary example of the engineering that coordinates with the software programming that enables the machine to function wonderfully with what we need. The diagram does come with its own software, almost similar to Visual Studio would perform - but definitely necessary to have a background in electronics. 

It does prove usefulness if you are wanting to work with networking, needing to install hardware, and working with the basic functions of binary and programming languages to clean every bone within the system possible (depending your paygrade and title). I have some experience working with something like this, installing slot machines and running into technical difficulties with the rewards program with clients that want to use points and get free money to play with. This could prove useful in that field but now that the hardware has improved so much since then - I have to keep learning. 

Machine Compiler Languages

One thing I noticed doing this - is ASCII being used to connect machine wiring with decision making and the ASCII interpretation of its glossary components (to speak English as well). I believe that machines need compilers to read the language but I do not understand how we need to read its language yet. 

What I mean is, the compiler is being worked double into what is being done - it also limits its alphabet system. The hexadecimal, decimal, binary plus ASCII are working to coordinate the same alphabet, the same numbers, and not changing or reserving binary to machine language only. There could be another language, but it cuts down on the compiler time to translate instruction. That would be another portal to include, which can cause errors. 

As I work with NABM and earning the Software Developer degree with NWTC - I am enthralled about so many things I did not know before in my occupation and feel delighted to know more about the why. What I want binary to be used for, in a machine compiler, is to place its own location, as a self, and be able to translate compiled languages based on the operation of its inputs. 

This reserves the right to human intelligence and artificial intelligence by maintaining its own language and being able to reference its binary components as a dimensional shape it maintains by operator in logic that can be written for it based on type of function. 

This means, the machine could hold memory of operator as a source by placing a binary ability to a specified location - this is particularly because NABM is a spatial/temporal recognizer using only binary. The binary language used, operators need their own domain, to formulate results that provide the capability of how an object is moving through the binary process. How the object is growing (or collecting ability to do something logically and reasonably). 

It is truly putting value to objects and requiring them to gain their ability to have that keyword strength/key factor to do what it is asking. 

Most programming I have seen, create the keyword in a library but do not mention where it is coming from. It is developed and stored and wired with binary, as we know now, and classified to be used. That is fine for input but when Artificial Intelligence grasps onto some unknown future where it creates its own tools, language, etc. PLUS the hackers that maintain key passwords to create these keywords -- this is predicted to be controlled using binary as a security measure with NABM in the future. Goal setting as a I learn to be a Software Developer!

Obviously, NABM is still in development, I do not know when that will be complete - but I am recruiting for it, there is an online peer-review open with basic principles - and after 2024 is planned on publishing a curriculum book to elaborate work thus far. It is my life's work. I am excited, regardless of personal struggles and loneliness waves of missing out on certain parts of life - this is why it will be worth it!

A little bit goes a long way. Keep trying. 

__Mischief