Thursday, September 14, 2023

2023 Is Only Almost Over... Update On NABM!

 NABM (Native American Binary Mathematics)

This is the ground-up attempt of relational environment realities influencing interpretive binary configurations for a truly virtual experience that can separate the robotic/artificial intelligence and humanity/natural reality. This is a learned inclusion of creating a language that is not over-powered by one side or the other (machine and user/programmer) and involves passages of binary signatures with their own domain to cause its programming etiquette to relay within these mapping systems how the machine will understand its reality is binary. 
This can be multi-dimensional signatures that create an ability of how that domain is connected - without maintaining one-dimensional (x,y) grids to compare with arcs and fish-lensing where distance cannot explain its current existence in time known. The time we have in virtual spaces is not defined properly, at this time. This is cause for concern when we consider AI able to self-teach amongst the human hours of database designs and creating something that can do what a human programmer can do - which is create a tool within cyber library data banks, heirloom it, and build without clearance - as undetected communication systems go unchallenged due to the tool-making in open source code. [Which is still being learned and not fast enough by my standards.]

If I could critique, it would be too soon, the connection with NABM and current programming models creates the sense of complete upon another techno-tool in a onesie. I can't take these things apart anymore, I cannot break it and expect myself to fix it, I cannot replace with what I have in my own keeping. Not even duct tape? How are basic machine operations and purchase histories not mandatory consumer knowledge on repairing by now? How is this not important to America as consumers? I think we want to become dependent on our purchasing powers rather than our solving dilemma. We would be a different country and thinking of our technological components differently as well. 

NABM as the internal parts of explaining directional shapes in space with conditions as spatial combatants to present our experience with a new time, new tools, and new results of recognizing new domains. These signatures will be how we explain the expansion of zero, one, and the artifiicial mind who clings to its existence. If human reveals these interface binary signatures before the artificial intelligence, we can continue to reclaim the space, the ability, the tool as naturally attuned to become something we harness. But does this leave room for the machine to become our competition? Perhaps, it is taboo to write of whence the scan of these writings provokes machine hallucinations to benefit on AI artwork as profitable. What is it, if it cannot find these avenues - and what do we do when it can? How do we prove that it cannot? 

This is the necessity with NABM. To monitor the tangible presence of mathematical reality by basing it from binary alone. NABM would suggest the inclusion of space - as Artifical Intelligence currently renders this as null, undefined, or as a location central to a quadrilateral grid; zero is empty value currently. 

Comparing Zero Principles to Zero Theories

Principles: A comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine, or assumption. (Oxford Dictionary)

Theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. (Oxford Dictionary)

Math Base Image
                                                          "What Base Is Our Mathematical Reasoning Explaining?" 

"Where did you learn how to count?" 
"My hands, toes, I suppose." 
"When did you do this, were you taught it?"
...thinking back to a memory....
"I felt it first before I could control it."
"If you could not control it, what use was it to you if you could not do it?"
...more thinking...
"Identifying variations is anomolous until we can count each blessing in our lives."

-The importance of counting (something)

The Base From Which You Arrive Logic - Is This Reasonable?

It is not. Going through logical thinking, critical thinking, and analytical courses in writing with core educational curriculums will not prepare you for the mathematical reasoning in a global feat. The history of mathematical concepts is astounding and shunned indirectly until commerced with value from tangible assets that develop a sense of time in use. These weights and measurements provide solutions from different concepts that have been studied, very thoroughly, if you have been able to notice. 

Honestly, they were searching for a comparison and evaluating the intelligence within a people for their integration to save humanity another compound fractured resemblance of speeding through innovation. What did our elders say? The base from which their relational reasoning provided interest to pursue the metaphysical components within spirituality arrived through language that described phrases of objects within vital dialects that connected through water, what we believe to be are roots with transfunctional usage to be broken down into the "compound fractured resemblance(s)" we peice together today. 

Why is this relevant? 
To arrive with historical figures of where it arrived conveniently (concepts of zero philosophies in the forms of principles and theories) with fragments of history of where we were and where we should be today are not far from clues that are provided in human history. The principles of NABM are natural and often primitive to believe that pictographs could inspire a transitional theory as zero philsophies (NABM) to be echoed within our time - is what all cultures globally have been doing in the modern era. "How was Zero part of our Culture and Teachings Then and Now?" 

I did not have an interpreter with me, as I panged at the zero concepts in my adult life, to explain algebra to my son - and so, I began searching for ways to explain mathematical concepts that related to him on a personal, cultural, prideful parental duty to assist with future concepts and a programming career. I was never told the history of mathematics, the concepts, or where they were explained to have existed prior to contact in America. 

I genuinely believe that America mathematical concepts were beyond this world in time, speed, and space. The abilities of fundamental principles established with relational concepts, direction (above and below), with the tools they did have (but not evidential for time of contact and inventory since). I say this because they claim that America did not have the wheel, but large stones - carved smooth have been evidential throughout all elevations in North and South America - and the Mayan Calendar - the canoe (birch bark and dugout style's parabolic shape, for example) and other tool aids could not be found that made them "less" than in their evolutionary stance in the world. This is important. This is going to be historical, credible, and the momentum for each culture's survival on the line - who do we emulate in the world and why? 

It's not to stop us, to gloat, but to continue improving. The transition of "understanding" has cost us generations of transitioning, conditioning, and improving in both lifestyles, customs, and mainstream activities that our mathematical reasoning has us feeling ill-placed without the correct forms to recover rapidly. 

Conclusion

The future is important. NABM deserves a fighting chance to explain the zero principles as the ability to expand increases its time to persist through perspective in value that belong to its foundational reasoning. This is explained as a sequence to a signature to a larger picture that includes multiple variations to explain zero - and relating each concept by the expansion rate as flexible enough to contain its domain in a living context that holds values in ability for operator(s). These are not always a pattern detectable. We see irregular objects and classify them as a zero word - null, object, something described as a similar word to observation, zero. This is capable due to the expansion style of what contained its axial connections to support a natural system that can harness zero. 

Miniscule respects to those granular counting cultures (India - as the main contributor I have recently learned of) and the commerce of their world history in diversity for providing peace to barter and uphold each other's systems. It truly is an old friend in your world. 

__Mischief




Monday, September 11, 2023

Modified SEO Equations & The AI Chatter

 SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Techniques and Modifying their Equations

On SemRush, something they did not have at the time was inputting keywords while deleting other keywords to get what you wanted. Something of making word sentences describing what we are searching for just wasn't a priority, it may never be. Concatenated strings that have value within each vocabularized entity and new language assortments really are not reliable communication techniques with computer validation sources or the integrity of its infrastructure. However, with front-end user communication it is a priority to not adjust so crudely the real meaning and limited vocabulary we use as human customers on search engine queries. 

So, how do you get the front-end user (customer) to use precise vocabulary without over searching or under searching the value in its SERP (Search Engine Results Page)? It is also a prompt on how to introduce types of vocabulary in media platforms to improve these results (also another avenue of branding a market on those keywords for continued use with their company, blogs, etc.) when searching for a miscellaneous object. 
First, let's assume they have no programming skills and have not kept up with what concatenation is. The ideal user is going to want to use strong vocabulary but cannot find the words for it without encountering descriptive uses that are not used in media suggestions. The customer wants to find an antiquated technique of building fire pits without leaving a trace behind and comes across "fire pit building for wooded campsites" as the best result. Is it the less words used to describe your search effective or using as many descriptive communication strings the most effective? Since the AI search is boosting its understandable conversationalist within the search, this should be easier today than it was a decade ago. The sentence structure is handled like a regular sentence and the equation is no longer needed to be effective of what you want to result and rephrase in multiple forms while searching the drop down suggestions (which is very helpful already). So how is this scored with SEO and SERP then (the artificial intelligent chatter knows how to find what you are looking for)? 

AI Chatter Image


Is the value in how to integrate AI chatter SERP indicators that the Modified SEO Equations will need to be re-adjusted for AI to configure what the front-end user is searching for after its conversation? The database technique has been used to archive based on keyword, alphabetized, and dated for its multiple input within whatever the keyword is. "Fire" brings up multiple images, descriptions, and adjective actions with what it is foremost and then revealing what is connected from that keyword - carries on the conversation. The speed the AI uses for those conversations is in place. What is the issue? 
Can the AI configure the natural environment, with proof of video, description, and request it to be manipulated with its imaging to reveal a virtual realistic reflection of what they are describing? This is real, the evidence that has been uploaded since, but now that you are asking an AI chatter something of realistic measures, it should be able to answer without referencing. Obviously, unless you request the reference. Is this what people expect or will be expecting in the future of AI Chat Searching?

Will programming conclude with allowing the self-teaching AI programmer to categorize based on its identification system so long as it uses a specified library categorization to their pulling requirements for use as well? It sounds silly to consider information as valued but that is a human intelligence that we are referring to that has been available for the most recent generational input. The input before this was obsolete and left to be interpreted afterwards. Do we understand how important that information is? What is the AI Chatter going to value it as? What part of us are we going to forget that it was us that input this basic data in for the AI Chatter to pull from its own virtual reality the solution it can resolve (if it were them in the same environmental problem). Do we want to get rid of our uploading time for this convenient, easy, clean search conversation? Are we going to be resolved if it is the AI Chatter who teaches us how to do something with our conditional problem? What would the solution be - do we execute it, have this AI Chatter follow us with its diagnosis and uphold it until the problem is solved? Does this answer our life problems and how to prove we truly needed the assistance if this profile AI Chatter is following us and documenting if the tasks are being accomplished? 
What does this value bring to the AI Chatter and the user within society? Is this what people are needing, wanting, or cringing? This will ultimately change the teacher-student relationship and the generational dependence we have on our teaching system to gain appropriate reactions, inquisitive observations, life experience, human relation intelligence scores may have to be invented upon daily interaction and age of use. I suspect this being illegal for minor children to use until they reach a healthy collegiate level. You literally cannot "go back" on those foundational years to say that it was wrong, to set them back, correct, and gain those identifiable connections after bypassing it. We can begin gaining these studies first with the introduction to cell phone usage, GPS driving, home security systems, and begin questioning those beforehand of any changes in people with those uses. Are they more likely to protec themselves, what did they do upon an error in action, did they take other steps beforehand? We really need our domestic counselors to begin taking the initiative to analyze our technological use and compare with reality shifts on our ideal reaction and authority figures within our society. 

How do we begin monitoring our behavior to integrate with AI? Let's start now with commenting if you would be available for a Q&A with a proper degree on a dissertation for licensing to begin a career title for these records? This is for the future of mankind and AI chatting technologies with other improvements with our technology within daily use. To recognize differences, impediments that would not survive today, and how to transition those skills to perform upon a global error or recknoning. 

__Mischief



Sunday, September 10, 2023

Review on "The NEWSTACK - Platform Engineering - What You Need To Know Now"

 The NEWSTACK "Platform Engineering - What You Need To Know Now"

The NEWStack Platform Engineering Article


The NEWSTACK is a great resource for software developers/engineers to bring out relevant ways to stay informed, updated, and concurrent with job description outside of projects/homework using a media platform stance to remain strong in the business formatting. The structured economical recourse to transition our leadership delegates smoothly into familiar ground also opens up the close explanation of why technological businesses are going to be required within the future competition (if not already happening). 

The newsletter after signing up with The NewStack - was downloaded and easy to read. The documentation for what to expect using this light read was exactly what any student in the field is looking for in regards to atmosphere, expectations, and what to be equipped for upon the door opening moments of being titled with the degree and categorized toolsets, ready to start. 

A couple of things that I took from this (tremendous help in my future) - was how to envision your team and inter-departmental communications that will be in transitioning other teams, other facets of the project, and how to coordinate the API mangement necessities for each task. 
Using the Platform as a Product approach (following the cues of Software as a Platform, Infrastructure as a Platform, etc.) those who are using the Platform to develop are internal customers in the eyes of the ownership of the project. Logging progress to anticipate error or standstill operable time using multiple ways to measure this progress. 
    I agree with the user research to establish the customer personas (software devs) to produce a roadmap and backing system that is logged for tight feedback looping. But, the marketing aspect was puzzling to me. How do you get the service level objectives (SLO) for marketing to the internal customer without backlashing that previous time. Isn't this a no-no in regards to time management? I think this was under a sandbox operation for devs to encounter a free-space for what they would bring to the project and make it happen with the instruction of improvement and enforcing a strong interface system to rely on its foundation. I think the business venture is productive, but in doses of its ownership project. 

The Most Important Skills was documented and polled within these projects and I just want to highlight one:
Knowledge of System Integration (67%)
Ability to automate processes (61%)
Familiarity with CI/CD (54%)

Knowledge of performance monitoring (42%)

Ability to execute end-to-end performance testing (38%)
Addressing roadblocks to agility (38%)

Knowledge of Performance Monitoring caught my attention as my level of educational objectives at this time and I felt like if I knew what to focus during my studies on how to make a name for myself in the field, I would be a reliable source for that one specified objective. I did not know what it would be, thinking less than what I knew in the career, and glad to know now. The performance monitoring are free tools online that can be done with websites using analytical tools and staying within this sphere of tool making, improving, and reading its source through and through with expecting it in a specified place and branching from this point of contact. 

What are the steps of this? 
1. There has to be something to monitor. 
2. Find what tools work best in specified code, situations, presentation, deployment/publishing. 
3. Debugging.
4. Elude anti-patterns and creating new ones. 
5. Self-progress and making checkpoints based on structured code and mentorship breakthroughs. Taking note of logic, syntax, and inter-departmental (security, API, engineering, etc.) expectations. 

I wanted to suggest restructing the image of the platform as a living thing that gets bigger. With the small foundation that develops from it, time, and work - it is hard to let these things go and feel like its going to fall apart without those initial directories and infrastructural support systems. I would prefer using a directional path of prioritizing for open channels without breaking the project task load, time of win rates. The channels they build with secure the infrastructure (while avoiding another anit-pattern of using the code as infrastructure) using inter-departmental standards as checkpoints. This doesn't provide a shape for the project other than full figured and ready to dance. This has to be a project worth the time invested in by being effective with the direction first. I just didn't want to create something that everyone had to catch like a ripple in a pond to say that this is what they were going to do while it touched their part of the perimeter, to ripple back at the dev and their work to re-do and maintain that initial ripple. It just sounded too shifty for me to feel like it was secure enough to get work done. 

This was mentioned within the article itself, with professional advice provided here as its review can merely reiterate what these professionals are doing so well in. It is specified to learn that this group they did focus group research with, work well together, and how them doing their tasks with effective communication was key. This is going to have to remain flexible and update frequently with other tools (another key advice provided within the article). 

Conclusion

I am going to integrate the terms "SLACK" , "DEMO DAYS" , "LUNCH-AND-LEARNS" to the NEW-TRG group time/schedule to meet. I want to consistently create these IT atmospheres to become comfortable and custom to meet while engaging in projects without losing that humanity and humor of being with a group you work well with. 
As for the article, I will keep opening those newsletters and stayin informed as I pursue the Software Developer degree for its career experiences that await me. 

__Mischief






Just do it.

The only way to know, is to do it! Going into my C# Part 2 course and IT Training this term, coming from A results in my first half with ASP...