US Constitution and FCC - Which one regulates the internet?

 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 

                                             Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Official Seal, Wikipedia.

Communication is regulated by the FCC within the United States of America that include: wire, radio, television, satellite, and cable. FCC Jurisdiction over broadband access, fair competition, radio frequency use, media responsibility, public safety, and homeland security are also within this federally recognized independent agency of the USA. (FCC Source)

The most recent induction of representation within this agency is the Space Bureau (SB) who leads with space-based communications, satellite, policies and licensing activities since April of 2023. This is a repercussive action from the division of the International Bureau forming also the Office of International Affairs. 

FCC Seal before 2020, Wikipedia.

U.S. Constitution and the FCC

The internet was originally intended for scholar articles, journals, and scientists to communicate via network with computers that contained databases of FTP protocols and early designs of telecommunications that held actual information (while wire services typically transmitted signals to be received in passing messages or with radio waves and frequencies to deliver messages via audio productions). The Telecommunications Act of 1996 enacted before the mass distribution of personal computers, website engineers for business, education, and eventually social sites and the start of a new economy within America. It is still a developing governance of jurisdiction, law, and federal control - which most internet service providers and engineers would prefer to stay out of federal domain. There is a pull to the jurisdiction, especially during the free access literature for communications using internet and the advancement of it. The push is providing a competition ground without establishing its currency, domain regulation for all to agree and abide with, and for it to circumvent into the American economy productively and without environmental burden. The priorities of internet have swept through the country without recognition to the natural environment, human study of virtual realities (frequency, wifi signals, satellite monitoring, and access through hack), and leadership. To catch a thief in these domains takes ciritical action, expertise, resources, and dedicated service in time which ultimately leads to major violations of homeland security. 

                                                                                   The Internet & Neutrality, Adobe.

Internet Neutrality (I highly recommend hitting this link to see what your working with via "Internet!")

The identifying name was changed to enact a connection for a "net neutrality" position to regulate the Internet Service Provider (ISP), its fair access policies (not blocking their customers from certain material online), transparency (agreements must be known between user and ISP), and no unreasonable discrimination. 

The Communications Act of 1934 is the first enactment that is referenced for who regulates the Internet as a communication field with the actual recognition of 'Internet' in the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

                                                    Communications Act of 1934, Wikipedia.

Communications Act of 1934, Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Net Neutrality

Making internet available, equally, between user and networking company that provides the service allocates the right to freedom of speech online. What it does not do, however, is regulate with the Environmental Protection Agency on its environmental impact. Signal pollution is a study that has not effectively been capable of measuring the strength of its service to the reprimands of migrational impacts, species instinction listings, and insectual increase since the 1990's. The temperature increase, global pandemics, and budget restraints due to increasing population with medical alleviated death tolls have dramatically altered the landscape of resources. At this rate, most can agree that it is not looking ideal to produce equal neutrality resources to anyone if it cannot be sustained. Regardless of sustenance and necessity resources, internet would also be impacted from the ability to serve its area if it becomes dependent upon its infrastructures. 

America needs to be ideal in who these services benefit and that out of protection of resource and land - it is best to not indulge in information that increases movement within people, speculation of rioting, and other sensitive information that promotes acts of hacking or embezzlement by using internet irregulated avenues at this time. Coercion of crowd containment and distractions of media involved speculations that involve social shifts in information release and developmental infrastructures increase the acts of identity fraud and manipulation to credit what is unforeseen for those that cannot learn the material fast enough. 

They did not poll for this service. They did not request an EPA standard. They do not post the results to public for signal pollution and remediation for migrational repair. They do not become responsible for being out of the element of its domain (Communications). How are these being interconnected today in 2023? The strength of leadership may be unaware to most of this development, considering their platforms or otherwise distractions. 

Solutions

People need to know it is still in development and that we need to think of future impacts before releasing its impact on our society. Games, Signal Pollutions, anything technology does have tremendous intake from the American public - and they are growing up in a developing virtual reality of social withdrawl, isolated extremist groups, and a guppy crowd of younger Americans that know nothing of technology and don't want to know. How do we lead for repair when the entire country has priorities that have not been consistent in types of information we manage the country with? We trust our leadership. (*>>>erkks... the same leadership who is too busy with their platform and distractions??)

It is still a choice. A freedom. 

Start putting technologist repetoires in our leadership with environmental priorities for damage control and begin resourcing people with blatantly announcing the choice to conserve genetic traits out of suppressing the fear of future without water, land, animals, and begin to repair our time with studying a necessary task for the health of the Country! 

** Can you believe that there isn't a law about internet, but about its communication service cost, availability, and type? People still don't know what internet is! It is the computer, that I send messages, and credit card information... but its the services that you conduct business with that those are governed and trusted. Data governance is a huge issue alongside the unmentionable - regulation and checking of monetary/fiduciary currencies being trafficked online. Where are the accountability reports for this? The compact agreements? The standards of operating a cash flow? The legitimate documentation for not creating your own currency to be rendered through a financial institution to pay out! 

Stay informed. Be active. Research. 

Ask!

__Mischief

SCIRP Journal Review - Signals In The Atlantic Ocean

SCIRP Journal Review - Positioning

Scientific Research Publishing, a place to publish peer-review scholarly articles in a scientific online community. 

Article: A Simulation of Reflected ADS-B Signals over the North Atlantic for a Spaceborne Receiver

Authors: Richard Van Der Pryt, Ron Vincent
Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Canada

Published Date: February 2016

SCIRP Journal

REVIEW conducted February 2023:

Searching for valid journals to form submission articles to validate an experience with online communities and service to improve educational subjects for another critique or opinion is the objective. 

What I find interestingly close are articles that pertain to the advancement of Programming and where it is being used. The software in these studies, improved (I believe) after the initial antenna, but for this article with Spaceborne receivers that use Python, I discuss the review and its ecological impact for direct contact with mammals and wildlife species altogether. 

I had previously read on the same website (different article) on the signal reactions for triangular methods used along with the type of signal (G3 Towers that have since been replaced with G5 Telecommunication Towers, FCC antenna registration.)

For the Programming of these signals, these items were unlisted for the study of its original tests: 

1. Reaction to surface in movement (tests were conducted over the Atlantic Ocean and considered the reflection of water but not the movement of it, as stated within this article).

2. Compensation Programming (this may have been an early model of Python since it did describe older technology in the article. I wanted to emphasize the techniques that did not wield the null space in its computations where the movement of water could not be recorded data). 

3. Delay/Change in return (The signal reached reflection, water surface and returned at this contact. It does not state specifically upon direct touch or an in-depth measurement. It appears to have unresolved calculations. This is very important for the ecological factor in evidential observations to act on). 

4. Measurement for signal value and its return value (They did not specify much detail about the Python Programming language, and what values were assigned in these tests to determine a change detected or how to correct the reflective rate of signals and its effects). 

5. Measure two components on linear so that it can answer these basic questions:

   

(Base (from the spaceborne receiver)) out to in (reflection or water surface).

   

in to out 

   

in to in (what was the reaction within this region that could have been studied within an enclosed space before outdoor contact to register any harms, detection, and ripple effects from the signal strength). 

   

is there an out - spectrum change? The article did determine the ionosphere that it was conducting these tests from, were listed as environmental features for the spatial coordination of signal strength being used. Was this signal an array of sorts that could be controlled?

Notes Under Review:

Signal polluters identified were the Atlantic Ocean and the ionosphere, within this range. 

Some interesting findings in the equations they used did not attest to the type of waves that they were measuring, other than the height of them. 

I would have liked to see something that coordinated with their null and pivotal change in reading for direct and reflected signals. I calculated that to interpret two forms of media structures being measured:

1. A receding wave that is pulling upwards into a pivotal crest. (Reverse Pivot)

2. A Filling motion that swells within this agreeable cavity location. (Over-Under)

The zero they reference within these equations represented a change (twist) of event that defined a divergence indicator - which did not mention it apart from each other, but together. 

There is a scintillating reading from the Ocean recalls, this is referred to as a Scattering Theory - which arrives to the signal emitted in the time of observation to find these direct initiatives to make contact with the Ocean. 

If the timing of these signals could be within the Direct range of a point of origin in the waves, readily available to range within the area of a surface (since it is determined to not be too dramatically specific in the exact location of when it hits the Ocean to be measured, so long as the distance from the point of origin was able to calculate an average or expected average). This could be changed to the time of signal emitted that is measured for an accurate reading during a time of a Reverse Pivotal moment in the wave of the Ocean. 

Similar to that as a surfer can arrive to, timing the lapse in waves and pinpointing its desired location for those direct signals to read sharply and continuously. 

The measurements they use to project are unrealistic. A direct signal is all that is necessary for this specific signal directing in a successful measurement. The projected rate is safe to say, in Oceanic measurements and height - it is determined by inclement weather as observed in the pilot seat to react and change measurements to something more dire and urgent in those scenarios. 

The signal from the antenna that are used (two, specifically a low emitting radar and an encompassing signal) that determine the lateral, longitudinal, and azimuth calculations. These were as expected but what puzzled me, was the actual data itself - since they are using a media such as water, does this not refract? In signal? If not, then why is it being suggested in a weak state such as being recalled reading only that type of data such as light emitted. 

A lot of the data that was presented, made it obvious that the emitted signal was outputting more than just a beacon of light to be dictated by reflection in water moving. 

I would have liked to see the divergence in type of signal, sound beds, sound bed made, polluter or environmental factors in the equations, and the changed images on the longitudinal, horizontal, and azimuth maps. 

Environmentally Responsible:

 Photo by Maël BALLAND

This was specific to signal and Ocean for not being able to detect its recall. I actually do not believe its findings or report for data - unless they absent mindedly collected it without intention of forming a report for review. I feel like the data could be valid, but the test has to change. Objective was not clearly defined. This was a presentation of data for distributing an appeal to reveal that signals don't harm animals in the Ocean (which I very much disagree with). People have a lot to do with whale beaching's and in the mass over the years. If they are watching them from satellite and directing their beacons onto them (without sound bed insulation tactics to not directly disturb the animal's sensitivity), that could be a case to take to those that have insulated a lifestyle with their presence in the divine forms. 

Conclusion:

It is this lack of care and judgement towards aquatic mammals and life in general that we find plenty of living species extinction rates climb. Is it because we are watching them too closely without regard to sensitivity? Migration on land and sea has changed. Many things have changed since the invention of these signal towers and satellites. 

NO DIRECT SIGNALS FOR OBSERVATIONS OF WILD SPECIES should permit the further investigations of these studies and data until a formidable case can provide its non-effects on aquatic species. 

I am looking forward to more signal receiving and outputting articles from this website. So far, I have updated further on a robotic article, a form of I am familiar with, and found it about the same. This was another update; I have been loosely watching in regard to the FCC and tower shift into a G5 instead of G3. The types of polluters I notice and what upgrades are doing to the natural environment, I am keeping a close eye on you and intend to continue working towards an effective measure for future safety procedures that impact global recognition towards our ecological duties. I would very seriously like to further my investigation into direct signals and EPA for the Oceanic Review and Standard Operating Procedures upon a migrational effort to cease signal pollution. 

Thank you!

__Mischief