Modified SEO Equations & The AI Chatter

 SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Techniques and Modifying their Equations

On SemRush, something they did not have at the time was inputting keywords while deleting other keywords to get what you wanted. Something of making word sentences describing what we are searching for just wasn't a priority, it may never be. Concatenated strings that have value within each vocabularized entity and new language assortments really are not reliable communication techniques with computer validation sources or the integrity of its infrastructure. However, with front-end user communication it is a priority to not adjust so crudely the real meaning and limited vocabulary we use as human customers on search engine queries. 

So, how do you get the front-end user (customer) to use precise vocabulary without over searching or under searching the value in its SERP (Search Engine Results Page)? It is also a prompt on how to introduce types of vocabulary in media platforms to improve these results (also another avenue of branding a market on those keywords for continued use with their company, blogs, etc.) when searching for a miscellaneous object. 

First, let's assume they have no programming skills and have not kept up with what concatenation is. The ideal user is going to want to use strong vocabulary but cannot find the words for it without encountering descriptive uses that are not used in media suggestions. The customer wants to find an antiquated technique of building fire pits without leaving a trace behind and comes across "fire pit building for wooded campsites" as the best result. Is it the less words used to describe your search effective or using as many descriptive communication strings the most effective? Since the AI search is boosting its understandable conversationalist within the search, this should be easier today than it was a decade ago. The sentence structure is handled like a regular sentence and the equation is no longer needed to be effective of what you want to result and rephrase in multiple forms while searching the drop down suggestions (which is very helpful already). So how is this scored with SEO and SERP then (the artificial intelligent chatter knows how to find what you are looking for)? 

Is the value in how to integrate AI chatter SERP indicators that the Modified SEO Equations will need to be re-adjusted for AI to configure what the front-end user is searching for after its conversation? The database technique has been used to archive based on keyword, alphabetized, and dated for its multiple input within whatever the keyword is. "Fire" brings up multiple images, descriptions, and adjective actions with what it is foremost and then revealing what is connected from that keyword - carries on the conversation. The speed the AI uses for those conversations is in place. What is the issue? 

Can the AI configure the natural environment, with proof of video, description, and request it to be manipulated with its imaging to reveal a virtual realistic reflection of what they are describing? This is real, the evidence that has been uploaded since, but now that you are asking an AI chatter something of realistic measures, it should be able to answer without referencing. Obviously, unless you request the reference. Is this what people expect or will be expecting in the future of AI Chat Searching?

Will programming conclude with allowing the self-teaching AI programmer to categorize based on its identification system so long as it uses a specified library categorization to their pulling requirements for use as well? It sounds silly to consider information as valued but that is a human intelligence that we are referring to that has been available for the most recent generational input. The input before this was obsolete and left to be interpreted afterwards. Do we understand how important that information is? What is the AI Chatter going to value it as? What part of us are we going to forget that it was us that input this basic data in for the AI Chatter to pull from its own virtual reality the solution it can resolve (if it were them in the same environmental problem). Do we want to get rid of our uploading time for this convenient, easy, clean search conversation? Are we going to be resolved if it is the AI Chatter who teaches us how to do something with our conditional problem? What would the solution be - do we execute it, have this AI Chatter follow us with its diagnosis and uphold it until the problem is solved? Does this answer our life problems and how to prove we truly needed the assistance if this profile AI Chatter is following us and documenting if the tasks are being accomplished? 

What does this value bring to the AI Chatter and the user within society? Is this what people are needing, wanting, or cringing? This will ultimately change the teacher-student relationship and the generational dependence we have on our teaching system to gain appropriate reactions, inquisitive observations, life experience, human relation intelligence scores may have to be invented upon daily interaction and age of use. I suspect this being illegal for minor children to use until they reach a healthy collegiate level. You literally cannot "go back" on those foundational years to say that it was wrong, to set them back, correct, and gain those identifiable connections after bypassing it. We can begin gaining these studies first with the introduction to cell phone usage, GPS driving, home security systems, and begin questioning those beforehand of any changes in people with those uses. Are they more likely to protec themselves, what did they do upon an error in action, did they take other steps beforehand? We really need our domestic counselors to begin taking the initiative to analyze our technological use and compare with reality shifts on our ideal reaction and authority figures within our society. 

How do we begin monitoring our behavior to integrate with AI? Let's start now with commenting if you would be available for a Q&A with a proper degree on a dissertation for licensing to begin a career title for these records? This is for the future of mankind and AI chatting technologies with other improvements with our technology within daily use. To recognize differences, impediments that would not survive today, and how to transition those skills to perform upon a global error or recknoning. 

__Mischief

Technical Resource Group

Question: If I was a robot what do I eat on the menu (not this one... a menu for robots)? 

Technical Resource Group

Get out and smell the roses with your robot and start networking with TRG to supplement our daily habits of a bi-weekly (every two weeks) meeting to discuss topics in the IT field. Updates, software, devices, virtual currency, PC repair hacks, and take project in a website portfolio design project to reference teamwork, communication, invested time towards the IT career path. Civic duties may include presentations to group, community engagement in a professional setting (field trips to events, webinars, etc.), an audience to engage in an online forum together to start topics of interest in the betterment of solution. 

Think of it like a lobbyist group for the IT field. Data governance is being groomed and we want to be heard! New literature on the subject online does offer opinions, comments, and allow us regular people to put our part in. 

Join for one, two, or more groups and begin a (possibly first in the area) network of dedicated IT field specialist recommendations, valid feedback on projects, and committed improvement motto. 

It's about having something to do or somewhere to go to look forward to as a budding techy. 

It's cool you're interested, but to remain serious, we do need to see some credentials in the IT field. A job, school, or the latest tech buzz hardware, software, gamer installation and research are welcome. 

Contact Bmetsmith@Gmail.com for more information on dates, times, and location!

Answer: Soup or Conductors ----------------- ?

(Superconductors or What is a superconductor? | Live Science @ www.livescience.com/superconductor for more information!)

Social Science - 1970's Bio

 Series VI: Minority Groups and Guidance

Indian Students and Guidance

John F. Bryde

University of South Dakota

Copyright 1971

The specific copyright for this book states that no form may be recorded or documented in electronic forms (or any form) without written permission. I will be stating a reflection piece of this monograph series. 

______________________________________________________________________________

I just want to remind everyone about Native American literature as a translation of integration. Native Americans have a value system that is not materialistic, Mr. Bryde does explain this from his perspective and reveals that it was the goal to change the character path settings for Native American in their education settings. I had researched his name and came across his obituary and how the community he worked with talked with humor, respect, and loss with his passing. It changed the way I read this book. I was more accepting to his perspective to demystify that missioner relation with their community involvement and appreciated his ability to state his educational opinion/teaching without personal victories. I felt like he knew more than stated and loved that part untold.

Being Native American in 2023, I am ashamed of the people who hound spiritual blessings to remain intact as respect. Respect is earned. The validity of being given any preferential reciprocation requires the person to undergo experiences that encounter its expertise of survival and lesson. The lesson's provided in life as reality are real, and in a man or woman, they are forgotten of footing to progress as each footing requires assistance. This handicapped mentality did not survive winters, child rearing, and fortunate tides. It has been brash to flare as the weak point of society and civility to encounter peace with the immobilization to magnify its detriment. 

Compassion in measures that endure priority over self is unreal. Even by modern standards. Survivalism is not compassionate to lost time with historical figures that can provide wise connections, but what variety was there to offer? The sociological plot expelled a few characters from being encountered at the sight of conversation with other men. These men defined a partnership that we learn about as a dominant review to relish as true. 

The untold stories, the forgotten stories, the encounter of women and their women folk in past time and modern time. The children of each encounter throughout time. The changed moralities and diversification to mainstream society have endured countless characters that reformed before they could exist. 

That began to exist as one. 

The ideals that exist, the characters of lesson, the mythic political beliefs that organize this world as one - can change. 

Right now, emotion as detrimental figures of historical trauma are magnified to enhance respect of its survival. Of progress. Of imitation. This will change and change again. There is a new 'oneness' to exist, as relation can see fit for its environment. 

I am ashamed because this has been forgotten and capsized for another type of people to conceive one world that we have blindly walked into by forgetting to explain truth in a circle is only for those that can fit in the circle. These external privileges provide us a world to step out of, but what they needed - was to be dependent upon first! They lost these privileges for being short-sighted and incompetent to relate time of encountering new ways into lesson through story by embracing a survival (and not counter-intuition and transformative education and commerce and relations after encounter). We boasted first. That firsthand of help was eager to forget the world of its priorities if all we can do is be of assistance that we know - you're a human being, at the same time, in the same place, in the same world - you know how to live. You know how to survive it. We are talking, here, and now (seasonal offerings are shorthanded in the wake of new religious freedom and embarking upon expansion to affixed eyes of capitalist and kingdoms in their name instead. They know how to survive already and we didn't want to make dependent neighbors.).

I am much too young to encounter these dilemmas while my elders remain apart from this type of character. It is teaching me beyond the modern world what was learned much before contact. These are not easily encountered, and, in its presence, I encounter historical records and recognize the error. 

The relationships between these documented interviews, references, resource of knowledge have to be remembered as Q&A. These are not full depictions of how the actual Native Americans were. There is so much more, but if you cannot see it for what it is, you may rely heavily on these prints as decipherable knowledge that you read right past your calling as if it were you who were doing the Q&A and mightily believe word for word. 

This is part of identity loss, when those who speak good of you, blind your will to read your calling. You would rather hear those around you speak of heroism from your presence. These are small pushes of that instilled survival aspect that belittles so much more qualitative reasoning as to who we are. 

I enjoy having this in my collection and I cannot wait to teach my younger generations by instilling further yet, more values that can consistently inherit these beliefs as partially stated. Until then, I conversate with modern America and enjoy our talks. The work done thus far, from what I have read, is amazing. Great insight. In tune with their self, their language, and their respect. I admire their work and understand the barriers, the time, the self-collection in work, the poise of expertise to perform in future scrutiny. It is well stated for the topic of defining the Indian student, throughout time. 

Religion, Native American, and American value systems. The new solution with inter-tribal (multiple types of Native American ancestry/nations) knowledge and future impacts of gained knowledge in the absence of one community is Tsha Tewahsana (Its In The Middle). A religious movement started with the Great American Eclipse (August 21, 2017 to April 8, 2024). 

One in place is heard when they describe relation from history. What they do not describe is one in the future. Upon encountering this new person, they failed me in my time, by not answering the question for me - but for them. 

Note: This cannot be reiterated due to the copyright within this text. The "one" factor arrives from relation to all things as we see in sustenance and creation as best as we can describe in communication. Everything arrives from one as kinship explains, in those beliefs. 

What I refer to, are the diverse kinds of people not from these lands and into blended societies of the world. We are different, even if we may appear the same humankind, and so, this is the reference I depict in those teachings and direction of our elders. They do not speak for the future, they speak of their history, apart from the world. 

Below are websites to coordinate that release and responsibility to have an inter-tribal, blended societal role to fulfill with the citizens that we have now. 

www.tshatewahsana.org

I got your answer in each direction but let's focus on only one - In the Middle, for future value transitions to incorporate the intangible and internet guided toolsets with our unique approach to solution, let alone, survival. How we really survive is continuously adapting to our environment and improving with our available tools (however it is available). 

__Mischief