Natural Binary Mathematics (NBM) Validation with Perspective
In the Scope of Relevance, we have an undefined shape. This shape can be anything or nothing. The point is, we define shape based from its binary compositional values we see in the identification system that is 1 and 0. The space created when this entity separates in a realization (they were never together, yet exist because of one another) is a type of validation. That realization that we are separate entities, in the same place or location, with separate agendas, priorities, etc. creates the Perspective enhancement that resides in reality.
This reality or environment is not a space that is empty. It is a shared memory space that can work together or disassociate from the shared memory its own personality or behavior. This type of damage or confliction creates a separate underlying environment that produces sustenance provisions for that entity and not the other. These are coordinates with reality spaces, realization of self-identification processes, and the natural formations that fluidly pronounce their presence as not too far from its shared memory, perspectives, and realities. This happens frequently, in one provisional space that contains all events in time - which extends drastically from a nothing to the next nothing (supposedly, in linear time, anyways, where space can attest to gaining this miraculous entity without binary to compensate its existence (?)(after nothing and before it could be nothing - is the next topic to comment for validation!).
So, let's just omit time from this collection of processes to assume, as we search for the foundation structures that be mathematical interpretation from NBM curriculum. One of the main struggles with foundational entities is the reproductive states, dimensional qualities, and size in a provisional area as unique.
Reproductive states: how does it happen again? Is this as big as it gets? Universally, translate this entity in reproductive degrees (metamorphosis, adaptation, flexibility) and its destruction process.
Dimensional Qualities: what else is looking at this thing at the same occurrence? Perspective exists from space, direction, movement, and plainly - from 0 to 1 differences. What other numerical notation must be suggested as how they fit - as hands can collapse into an interlocking grasp - awkward to use with other tools and reasons but still capable of containing only self.
Size in provisional area as unique: zero is contained as one super-huge memory and directive coordinator while one-value is microscopically attuned to its size in relation to its space as its domain when perspectives are peeled from truth. These microscopic false values create a truth, at some point, in any logical truth table - as collectively agreeing they are not zero but still reside with zero. The size creates an illusion to match body with a unique area but its what separates these entities (not just in size) that becomes another validation of truth.
Example: There is one entity in a provisional space, what is allowed for its defining moment. This could be an empty room, it could be a room with a chair. Whatever is in the room with you, this one entity, you are told it means nothing. Literally, nothing, and so you must perceive it as such.
Wow, I get stuff, but it's nothing, and I get to familiarize myself with defining who I am in this space, but once I leave - there is no going back to this room. The room is always the same, nothing.
You go in, make yourself comfortable, and you are told nothing. Expected nothing.
What do you do?
Nobody told you what this meant. Nobody said how long you get. Nobody was there to guide you. It's nothing.
The Universe knows who you are. What you need. What you may want. What you will do. What you endure. Everything. It is already answered, your provisional space, however unique, identified you in this time as one entity. Nothing is provisional to validation when everything is "right" and there is no next best thing - because even nothing is limited to everything as everything is limited to nothing. This attraction should create a natural pull-away moment, but it brings them together, the more they repel each other - so conflicting! Everything draws a bigger nothing as its complexities gather from root to maximum. Nothing remains the same, almost stagnant, yet consistent in age for a safeguard of time to exist. Validation is created in their chaotic relationship.
How is the binary approach remediating this example? Nothing is an amassing equal to everything, if not more, since it is internal and external everything. This boundary literally sees an endless supply of self to validate beyond everything. I would even suggest binary to be capable of supplying another Universe of everything - and in that everything - we have separate rules of degrees that create burden to flexibility as poetry interpretations from natural laws that persist to believe that they are amassing together.
They're not. They are separated from nothing!
Nothing is my current teacher right now and I have been in some remarkable time shift of great awakenings that call for an American Spirit. I believe in stories that are real and the purposes we are living now, of all times, as a reset of this side of the world's usual baktun calendric tally markings of spirits, essences, forces. They are forgotten, lost, and abandoned with no trace left behind.
Nothing can contain an article, item, set of tangible and intangible materials. Is this true?
I would suggest we take a look at how we are inter-connected with nothing, space, and null value spaces that need to breathe, destroy in exhalation processes, and die everyday (just a little bit) to create movement in currents that touch nothing and retreat into everything again. We will encounter something in nothing until we, ourselves, are forgotten as something into nothing. This type of willing release is a permanence - a pattern of cyclic measurements that create time or age with entities as realization is validation for perspective to exist. The illusion is that the older we get, the more wise we are - when this example is telling you to exist without a scope - how can you achieve beyond your own contact with something, when you find out that concrete existence is the contact with nothing instead?
You limit your scope with the contact to control everything, as it is now.
You provide ample room for more unique environments, upon nothing.
Anything can be great, but can you remember the last time when you were awesome? I say this, because, you needed to read it. Believe it. That shared memory is wreaking havoc on your touch with nothing - to secure that reigning fire of do-gooding awesomeness as a now thing. You need to make it a Universe already!